tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-39595210029548632362024-02-12T02:17:25.021-08:00Lex orandi, lex credendiThe law of prayer is the law of belief. What we pray at the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is just as important as how we pray it.benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.comBlogger350125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-76815638969135421792015-06-26T21:21:00.002-07:002015-06-26T21:21:46.159-07:00Orienting Ourselves to the Lord<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEha06bxNNox6tEbPX7DBRRX-cmAPA5Wq1xRbUqM1J22HfXg-20YFIrdM9rsDP-eE4grd2s7Yd4mFjaxFPx_yy6rEX-kinIZp_CcXKI1Rji2fTbI2HY87mWJWGhRDW-Ke6nEclSjZl9uGZY/s1600/243_Francis_Ad_Orientam_IMAGE.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEha06bxNNox6tEbPX7DBRRX-cmAPA5Wq1xRbUqM1J22HfXg-20YFIrdM9rsDP-eE4grd2s7Yd4mFjaxFPx_yy6rEX-kinIZp_CcXKI1Rji2fTbI2HY87mWJWGhRDW-Ke6nEclSjZl9uGZY/s320/243_Francis_Ad_Orientam_IMAGE.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
At one of the training seminars I attended, the presenter told us that the average person needs to listen to something at least 27 times before getting the message. I think that the same can be applied to liturgical matters.<br />
<br />
A priest friend of mine told me that he was at a clergy gathering where the issue of Ad Orientem came up. There were various opinions about this. For any local clergy who read this blog, here is some pertinent that may help clarify this issue.<br />
<br />
In the year 2000, a European bishop had the same concerns and presented the issue before the Congregation for Divine Worship. The bishop, in question, asked if the position of the priest facing the apse was to be excluded. Jorge Cardinal Media, then-Prefect for the CDW, responded in the negative. <br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;">It would be a
grave error to imagine that the principal orientation of the sacrificial
action is [toward] the community. If the priest celebrates <i>versus populum, </i>which is a legitimate and often advisable, his spiritual attitude ought always to be <i>versus Deum per Jesus Christum </i>[toward
God through Jesus Christ], as representative of the entire Church. The
Church as well, which takes concrete form in the assembly which
participates, is entirely turned <i>versus Deum </i>[towards God] as its first spiritual movement.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;"> </span>
<br />
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;">It appears
that the ancient tradition, though not without exception, was that the
celebrant and the praying community were turned <i>versus orientem</i>
[toward the East], the direction from which the Light which is Christ
comes. It is not unusual for ancient churches to be "oriented" so that
the priest and the people were turned <i>versus orientem</i> during public prayer.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;">It may be
that when there were problems of space, or of some other kind, the apse
represented the East symbolically. Today the expression <i>versus orientem </i>often means <i>versus apsidem</i>, and in speaking of <i>versus populum</i> it is not the west but rather the community present that is meant.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;">..</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;">What always remains is <i>the event</i>
celebrated in the liturgy: this is manifested through rites, signs,
symbols and words that express various aspects of the mystery without,
however, exhausting it, because it transcends them. Taking a rigid
position and absolutizing it could become a rejection of some aspect of
the truth which merits respect and acceptance.</span></span></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br />
This particular document, <span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;">Prot. No 2036/00/L, was published at the Vatican on September 25, 2000. To date, Rome has held firm to this ruling. Ad Orientem is not only allowed, it is encouraged. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;">Four years after Rome issued its ruling, a young priest, Fr. Uwe Michael Lang, wrote a book, Turning Towards the Lord, on the same subject. The former Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger wrote the foreword to the book. Fr. Lang writes that:</span><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;">The rubrics of the renewed <i>Missale Romanum</i>
of Pope Paul VI presuppose a common direction of priest and people for
the core of the Eucharistic liturgy. This is indicated by the
instruction that, at the <i>Orate</i>, <i>fratres</i>, the <i>Pax Domini</i>, the <i>Ecce</i>, <i>Agnus Dei</i>, and the <i>Ritus conclusionis</i>, the priest should turn towards the people.<b>7</b>
This would seem to imply that beforehand priest and people were facing
the same direction, that is, towards the altar. At the priest's
communion the rubrics say "<i>ad altare versus</i>",<b>8</b> which would
be redundant if the celebrant stood behind the altar facing the people
anyway. This reading is confirmed by the directives of the <i>General Instruction</i>, even if they are occasionally at variance with the <i>Ordo Missae</i>.<b>9</b> The third <i>Editio typica</i> of the renewed <i>Missale Romanum</i>, approved by Pope John Paul II on 10 April 2000 and published in spring 2002, retains these rubrics.<b>10 </b>This interpretation of the official documents has been endorsed by the Roman Congregation for Divine Worship. </span></blockquote>
<br />
Thus, even the rubrics in the Roman Missal assume that the celebrant and the faithful hold a common posture, facing the altar. <br />
<br />
To further his point, Fr. Lang also cites the future Pope Benedict XVI when he notes that:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;">Cardinal
Ratzinger draws a useful distinction between participation in the
Liturgy of the Word, which includes external actions, especially reading
and singing, and participation in the Liturgy of the Eucharist, where
external actions are quite secondary. He writes:</span><br />
</blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Helvetica, Geneva, Arial, SunSans-Regular, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Helvetica, Geneva, Arial, SunSans-Regular, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;"><i><span style="color: black;">Doing</span></i></span><span style="color: black; font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;"> really must stop when we come to the heart of the matter: the <i>oratio</i>. It must be plainly evident that the <i>oratio</i> is the heart of the matter, but that it is important precisely because it provides a space for the <i>actio </i>of
God. Anyone who grasps this will easily see that it is not now a matter
of looking at or toward the priest, but of looking together toward the
Lord and going out to meet Him.<b>19</b></span></span></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Helvetica, Geneva, Arial, SunSans-Regular, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times, "Times New Roman", serif;">This viewpoint is also held by the current prefect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Robert Cardinal Sarah, who observes that:</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Helvetica, Geneva, Arial, SunSans-Regular, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times, "Times New Roman", serif;">It is entirely consistent with the conciliar constitution, it is indeed
opportune that, during the rite of penance, the singing of the Gloria,
the orations, and the Eucharistic prayer, everyone, priest and faithful,
should turn together towards the East, to express their will to
participate in the work of worship and of redemption accomplished by
Christ. This manner of doing things could opportunely be put into place
in cathedrals, where liturgical life must be exemplary.</span></span></span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Helvetica, Geneva, Arial, SunSans-Regular, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica, Geneva, Arial, SunSans-Regular, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times, "Times New Roman", serif;"> In fact, as I noted in an earlier blog post, Cardinal Sarah has even proposed inserting this clarification into the Roman Missal so that it can be clear to everyone that Ad Orientem is not something that should be dismissed.</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica, Geneva, Arial, SunSans-Regular, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times, "Times New Roman", serif;">I hope that this blog post can help clarify what Ad Orientem really means and how, according to the Roman Missal and the interpretation of the Congregation for Divine Worship, it is certainly a legitimate posture for the celebrant to employ. </span></span></span><br />
<blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Helvetica, Geneva, Arial, SunSans-Regular, sans-serif;">
</span></blockquote>
<br /><br />
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;"> </span> benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-85021586912067887672015-06-25T18:32:00.000-07:002015-06-25T18:34:13.801-07:00A Taste of the Heavenly Liturgy<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg3XhFdpe2sSZbZfv3psWTWQek9FAl91AyGnCi1Z_uZwHqN5o_ikdwyr2EfnRvM6pMVnwUot9-Ijrkt59OHSCHuG0WLjTW2ej569lkLSt63djN64nWjsvMuurFxgyAXkZjOqlAbooxsYzQ/s1600/johnbaptist3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg3XhFdpe2sSZbZfv3psWTWQek9FAl91AyGnCi1Z_uZwHqN5o_ikdwyr2EfnRvM6pMVnwUot9-Ijrkt59OHSCHuG0WLjTW2ej569lkLSt63djN64nWjsvMuurFxgyAXkZjOqlAbooxsYzQ/s1600/johnbaptist3.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
Yesterday, the Universal Church commemorated the Nativity of St. John the Baptist, the forerunner of the Lord. When the Church celebrates a saint or a blessed, she usually reckons the feast by the date of the holy person's death. Their death is their birth into new life.<br />
<br />
However, other than the Nativity of Our Lord, the Church celebrates the births of the Blessed Virgin Mary (inclusive of her Immaculate Conception) and St. John the Baptist. The Blessed Mother's conception and birth are important because these events set the wheels in motion for the coming of Christ. The nativity of St. John the Baptist is unique, not only because of the supernatural circumstances surrounding it, but because he serves as the bridge between the Old and the New Testaments. According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, St. John the Baptist "surpasses all the prophets, of whom he is the last" because the saint "goes before (the Lord) in the spirit and power of Elijah." The Catechism goes on to note that he is "the Lord's immediate precursor or forerunner, sent to prepare his way." Even from the womb, St. John the Baptist "inaugurates the Gospel", as he leaps for joy at Mary's greeting because the Lord was close at hand. <br />
<br />
As a major solemnity, the liturgy for the day certainly deserves the best that the Church can give, especially when it comes to music. <br />
<br />
Yesterday, my employer gave me the day off because of an out-of-town conference. I decided to visit the local monastery of the Congregation of St. John, commonly known down here as the "Brothers". One of them, a friend of mine, had just come back from the Sacra Liturgia Conference in New York. He and his brethren are trying to re-infuse the sacred back into their liturgies. It certainly showed at yesterday's Mass.<br />
<br />
The altar arrangement was very Benedictine in nature. By "Benedictine", I mean Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI: three candles on either side of the altar with a beautiful gold crucifix at the center. The monastery chapel is very simple in nature, but, the layout has a Middle Eastern, almost other-worldly feel. Prior to the Mass, the brothers, led by their deacon, chanted midday prayer. We were invited to join them in prayer. We chanted the Veni Creator Spiritus and the corresponding psalms for the solemnity.<br />
<br />
Had we stopped at midday prayer, I would have been spiritually satisfied because of the beauty of the chants that filled the sacred space. But, there was more to come. My friend caught sight of me and asked me if I wanted a chant book. I said, "Of course," and he lent me a copy of the Gregorian Missal and told me which parts of the Mass we would be using. We were to chant the Kyrie, using the Orbis Factor, and the Latin Mass IX setting. Even though I didn't know the setting, thanks to the Corpus Christi Watershed's tutorials, I was able to stumble my way through the Gregorian notes. I then spied my friend's copy of the <i>Simple English Propers</i>!!! This was BIG! Having downloaded the PDF onto my iPhone, I swiped my way to the Solemnity of St. John the Baptist and was ready. Even though it has been awhile since I used Adam Bartlett's settings, the tone was familiar.<br />
<br />
As the Entrance chant began, I joined my friend and the Sisters of St. John. Even though I was a little off, it was incredibly powerful and refreshing to sing the Mass. While my voice was not at its best form, I could not help but joyfully chant out the Introit and the rest of the Mass. <br />
<br />
Although incense wasn't used, it's lack certainly did not take away from the majesty and the beauty of the liturgy. The prayerful reverence of the celebrant, who wore beautiful vestments, the homily which came from heartfelt simplicity and the overflowing of the magnificence of the chants made this a truly profound liturgy for me. It "cut to the heart" of what authentic worship is. It is not someone at the microphone waving arms and leading us into some banal rendition of OCP's latest "relevant" song. It's not loudspeakers blaring the sounds of a praise band. It is the noble simplicity of praying the Church's actual texts in music that best expresses its form. It is about offering God worship in spirit and in Truth. It is an experience of the heart and the soul that transcends time and space.<br />
<br />
St. John the Baptist came from the priestly class. His father, Zechariah, was a priest. He was exercising his priestly office when the Archangel Gabriel appeared to him to give him the glad tidings of the coming of St. John the Baptist. I'd like to think that the young John learned the importance of authentic worship from his father. It was fitting, then, that a priest should be the one to make way for the Messiah.<br />
<br />
And so it goes with the Mass. The Holy Sacrifice is our encounter with the Divine. This encounter should be out of the ordinary. A properly celebrated, reverent liturgy with sacred music, majesty and beauty makes way for that encounter with God. The solemnity of the music becomes like St. John the Baptist, pointing us to and leading us towards Christ. <br />
<br />
<br />benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-33561890657290499652015-06-18T19:28:00.001-07:002015-06-25T08:58:39.716-07:00The Real Earthquake<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiScBXdAQQyY4uRSOgAmwrEKJT9rlEBugyMy-JKqZV3a_oBIUXBYdFDM7quYHdEC4sNkbYUiMsmuAhB_llqE2OqepioBuJWKLb5GeszdKzw-b5rkGHc_dj6BuaxohLDzBHFua0IiLKjGqs/s1600/earthquake3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" closure_lm_379214="null" height="194" oua="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiScBXdAQQyY4uRSOgAmwrEKJT9rlEBugyMy-JKqZV3a_oBIUXBYdFDM7quYHdEC4sNkbYUiMsmuAhB_llqE2OqepioBuJWKLb5GeszdKzw-b5rkGHc_dj6BuaxohLDzBHFua0IiLKjGqs/s320/earthquake3.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
For all of the talk about Laudatio Si, Pope Francis' new 80,000-word encyclical on the environment, the bigger earthshaker, as far as I am concerned, came from just across the Piazza San Pietro, at the Congregation for Divine Worship. The relative new Prefect, Robert Cardinal Sarah, sent major tremors of his own in a piece he wrote for <em>L'Osservatorio Romano</em>.<br />
<br />
In his frank article, published in the Vatican newspaper, Cardinal Sarah makes some rather epic statements about the state of the Church's liturgy. He was direct in his emphatic words concerning the Church's form of sacred worship. <br />
<blockquote>
The liturgy is essentially the action of Christ. If this vital principle is not received in faith, it is likely to make the liturgy a human work, a self-celebration of the community. To speak of a ‘celebrating community’ is not without ambiguity and requires real caution. The <i>participatio actuosa</i> [active participation] should not therefore be understood as the need to do something. On this point the teaching of the Council has often been distorted. It is instead to let Christ take us and associate us with his sacrifice.</blockquote>
Now, he is not saying anything new. Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI made the same prophetic statements as the former Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger. He even wrote three books and numerous araticles on the subject. As pope, Benedict certainly tried to lead by example. The noble beauty of the vesture he used, the enhancement of chant in the liturgy and his orientation towards the Other helped to enhance and increase the aura of sanctity in the liturgy. <br />
<br />
Cardinal Sarah even touched upon the issue of the orientation of both the celebrant and the faithful during the Mass. He soundly dismisses the mistaken notion that the celebrant and the faithful need to face each other at all times.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
It is entirely consistent with the conciliar constitution, it is indeed opportune that, during the rite of penance, the singing of the Gloria, the orations, and the Eucharistic prayer, everyone, priest and faithful, should turn together towards the East, to express their will to participate in the work of worship and of redemption accomplished by Christ. This manner of doing things could opportunely be put into place in cathedrals, where liturgical life must be exemplary.</blockquote>
<br />
<br />
Here, Cardinal Sarah advocates for the usage of ad orientem. For me, this is of particular importance because there remains so much misunderstanding about this particular posture, even from those who should know better. Is the celebrant giving me his back when he uses this posture during Mass? Why isn't he looking at us? This line of questioning is almost akin to liturgical navel-gazing. The celebrant and the faithful are not the most important actors in the Mass. The Lord is. When we spend more time looking at each other instead of turning towards the Lord, we have missed the point of the Mass. <br />
<br />
Ad Orientem is slowly coming into being, thanks to pioneers like Benedict XVI, Bishop James Conley and Fr. Uwe Michael Lang, who have promoted this posture through both word and deed. Even Pope Francis has made use of thsi posture on a few occasions. The celebrant faces the faithful when addressing them, but, he joins them in turning towards the Lord when making supplication to God on their behalf. <br />
<br />
Another point that Cardinal Sarah touches on is the use of Latin. While he is saying nothing new, his spirited defense of the language is certainly cause for relief for those of us who have been out swirling in a never-ending sea of OCP-concocted bilingual liturgies. Rather than unite language groups, these liturgies cause a further divide as they do not encourage prayer in the common language of the Church, the tongue she has used for centuries.<br />
<br />
According to the online journal Catholic Culture, <br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"Cardinal Sarah recalled the Council’s teaching that the faithful should 'be able to say or to sing together in Latin those parts of the Ordinary of the Mass which pertain to them,' and said that the liturgy 'must stop being a place of disobedience to the requirements of the Church.'" </blockquote>
<br />
Sadly, as I have written on many occasions, this seems to be lost on OCP which prides itself on releasing the latest bilingual settings that promise to unite bilingual congregations in song when, in reality, they only promulgate the great divide.<br />
<br />
But, Cardinal Sarah brings new hope. He brings a promise of carrying out the liturgical reforms initiated by Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI. Cardinal Sarah asked Pope Francis what was expected of him in his new role as prefect. According to the African cardinal, it is the wish of Pope Francis that he continue Benedict's liturgical work. And that was the real bombshell as well as cause for great hope! <br />
<br />
<br />benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-77214064244067270572015-04-19T17:01:00.001-07:002015-04-19T17:05:55.654-07:00Rubrics and Relevance<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjWUn3ZWm-2i0bQ_nuVLDIo31rqGC7Kcon0pEwZ8MNEOXG16lcH32Udy9eiWaKSN10qQWpnJW3dVrMbrIjAB9cN9YNaLQOBs1E0-rQ8J2Pizc2rRWPRaqaf0WY73Z3wX8uGQzVFFGXs9Io/s1600/Retable_de_l'Agneau_mystique_(7).jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjWUn3ZWm-2i0bQ_nuVLDIo31rqGC7Kcon0pEwZ8MNEOXG16lcH32Udy9eiWaKSN10qQWpnJW3dVrMbrIjAB9cN9YNaLQOBs1E0-rQ8J2Pizc2rRWPRaqaf0WY73Z3wX8uGQzVFFGXs9Io/s1600/Retable_de_l'Agneau_mystique_(7).jpg" height="180" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
At this morning's Mass, our celebrant preached an impassioned homily regarding the beauty of the sacred liturgy. He stressed how important it is that we follow the rubrics as handed down to us by the Church. In fact, he read to us an account by St. Justin Martyr on the liturgical practices, circa 150 AD.<br />
<br />
This is not the first time that the celebrant has preached on the importance of rubrics. Yet, this time, there was a sense of urgency to his words. He touched on the themes of obedience and propriety of music. I found his words both comforting and encouraging, as he tries to live up to what he professes. Since Advent, he has been celebrating Mass Ad Orientem and he has encouraged us to be more reverential before, during and after Mass to the point of admonishing us not to applaud the choir and to be mindful of the presence of the Blessed Sacrament.<br />
<br />
He reminded us that, after the Resurrection, Jesus spent 40 days with the surviving 11 Apostles, teaching them and stressing to them that He would remain with them through the Eucharist. What He did at the Last Supper and at Emmaus, Jesus now wanted the Apostles to learn to do. Through their words and actions, Jesus would continue His real Presence; however, they had to understand the Eucharist and what they were supposed to do.<br />
<br />
Fast forward to 2015. Although the format of the liturgy has evolved (somewhat), the Mass still resembles what St. Justin Martyr wrote about nearly 1950 years ago. However, lamentably, it seems that our collective understanding has changed, and not for the better. For whatever reasons, we seem to have taken it upon ourselves to make "improvements" to the Mass, on what we perceive to be our own authority. We want to make the Mass more relevant to our youth by using insipid, commercially-produced music that we believe to be more "meaningful" to our young people. As Benedict XVI rightly pointed out, we have attempted to cobble up for ourselves our own version of the Mass. It is almost as though we were committing the sin of Adam and Eve. We "know" better than the Church as to how our Lord is to be worshipped. We, rather than the Church, have become the masters of the liturgy, treating it as our own personal property.<br />
<br />
We choose substandard, catchy music that is theologically poor because we believe that it will appeal to the youth, never minding that young people hunger for something real, something transcendent. We believe that our own efforts will help make the Mass more relevant, forgetting that the Lord, Himself, is the author and master of the liturgy. It seems as though, liturgically, we have fallen prey to the "dictatorship of relativism" that the former Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger warned us about in the homily he preached at the Conclave Mass 10 years ago.<br />
<br />
The celebrant's homily seemed to have touched a nerve on some, especially when he spoke of the music. He stressed how important it was to expose the youth to what the sacred liturgy should be. They need to spend quiet moments with Our Lord in contemplation during Holy Hour. They need to be exposed to music that enhances the sacred nature of the Holy Sacrifice, not detract from it.<br />
<br />
Interestingly enough, late this afternoon, when I was checking my Facebook feed, I found that someone had posted a picture of the homilist at her Mass taking a "selfie" with the CCD kids. She tagged a Facebook friend of mine and thus, all of the mutual friends were able to see it. A newly ordained priest opined that he had hoped that this wasn't taken during Mass. Sadly, the person who originally posted it confirmed it. I explained to the person, not a Facebook friend, that while the intentions were good, it was not the most appropriate thing to do. Her response was that she and her CCD teachers make it a point to reach out to the youth and try to make the Mass more relevant to the kids. In my response, I wrote to her that if we are looking to make the Mass more relevant to the kids, then we have lost the real meaning of the sacred liturgy. It seems to me that we no longer believe that what the Church gives us is good enough and that we have to invent something for ourselves.<br />
<br />
To this, the morning homilist said that we are not being obsessed with liturgical law. Liturgical law helps ground us on the sacred. It is akin to the liturgical law that no less than God the Father gave to Ancient Israel, wherein He dictated to His people just how He was to worshipped. Whenever Ancient Israel deviated from what God had ordained, they were punished. In fact, some met with fatal results. This is not to say that we advocate engaging in such measures for the New Israel, although Francis Cardinal Arinze was quick to make the comparison some 11 years ago in an address he delivered. Nonetheless, just as Ancient Israel was obligated to obey the Lord in all things, especially where worship was concerned, so to are we, the New Israel, obligated to obey the Lord.<br />
<br />
Maybe what the good CCD coordinator could do is to study the liturgy more thoroughly and allow herself and her team to be enriched and imbued with the supernatural graces that are enhanced when the Holy Sacrifice is celebrated properly and reverently with the tools given to us by the Church, including sacred music. Maybe if all of us study the Mass and allow ourselves to be enveloped in its beauty, we can begin to understand what it means to offer fitting worship. <br />
<br />
The Mass doesn't need to become relevant; rather, we need to change ourselves. The rubrics can help us reach that end.benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-69244679654977134332015-03-29T14:33:00.001-07:002015-03-31T11:02:54.081-07:00Right and Just<div>
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgc3I932OBDiByUVMj0T8vwuN1vgFlgwOLhpe2mY7Dc7fdO-VwnTXpIM7pl2YOmqoJHoFxcjR1avkfyyx7NHL1hec9JaSO6XXgpVsI6ilgo2uuk_fHeInTL16aYb72H8Ed16cgdQ_f5BtI/s640/blogger-image--1591225405.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgc3I932OBDiByUVMj0T8vwuN1vgFlgwOLhpe2mY7Dc7fdO-VwnTXpIM7pl2YOmqoJHoFxcjR1avkfyyx7NHL1hec9JaSO6XXgpVsI6ilgo2uuk_fHeInTL16aYb72H8Ed16cgdQ_f5BtI/s640/blogger-image--1591225405.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
In St. Mark's Gospel account of the Passion, he presents the story of a woman who anointed Jesus' head with expensive oil. The disciples criticize her because the oil cost roughly 300 days wages. Jesus rebukes them, praising the woman's great act of love.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
The woman is not stingy with Jesus. She generously pours out the oil over his head. She gives of herself to him. She gives her heart. What she does is right and just.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
In the Roman Missal, the faithful acclaim that "it is right and just", as they respond to the celebrant's invitation, "Let us give thanks to the Lord, our God." But, what does "right and just" mean, especially now that we have begun Holy Week?</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
I believe that it means that we allow ourselves to delve deeper into the sacred Mysteries that these beautiful rites present to us. I believe that if we can take the time to study what these mean and engrave them in our hearts, we can work towards an authentic and deep offering of what is "right and just" to the Lord.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Two friends of mine, on different occasions, each sent me a private message regarding my concerns about the matter of sacred music and why we should concentrate on offering the Lord what is certainly most appropriate and best. One of my friends likes and exclusively uses OCP's Spirit and Song collection. Both of them asked me if it was sinful. In my responses to each, I explained to them that we should not reduce music to the lowest common denominator. We miss the point of liturgy. We miss the point of offering what is "right and just."</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
We have only to look at the example of Cain and Abel. Both bothers offered sacrifice to the Lord; Cain offered him the produce of the land, while Abel gave him the finest, fatted lamb. The Lord favored Abel's sacrifice because, like the woman who anointed Jesus, Abel spared nothing for the Lord. In fact, in the Roman Canon, Abel's sacrifice is mentioned. Sadly, in his envy, Cain murdered his brother. He lost focus amd offered the bare minimum to God. When he saw that the Lord favored Abel's sacrifice, Cain became enraged. We know the rest of the story.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
This is not to say that my friends were sinful. They, like many of us involved in some sort of liturgical ministry, want to offer the best to the Lord. But, how can we get to what is "right and just"? </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
The best way could be to use the richness and beauty of the Roman Missal as a guide. The Roman Missal presents with the foundation and framework for the Church's liturgies, especially during Holy Week. The rich texts of the Collect, the Offertory, the Prefaces and the Prayer after Communion, help us to elevate our souls, hearts and minds to the sacred mysteries that unfold before us. The Roman Missal even guides us to the correct music with its Antiphons. During Palm Sunday and the Paschal Triduum, the Roman Missal even provides us with the chants. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Chants are the liturgical equivalent of the expensive, aromatic spikenard that the woman used to anoint Jesus. Chant is costly, in that it takes time and effort to learn. It is not impossible to learn, thanks to YouTube and other resources. Chanting the actual prayers of the Mass gives unity to the liturgy. It helps it flow the way it was meant to be. One doesn't need to do this in a grand, baroque cathedral. Even the most modern can do. Suitable, sacred hymnody, such as "All Glory, Laud and Honor", "O Sacred Head Surrounded" and "What Wondrous Love Is This" help to bring the tenor of the Holy Week liturgies. The Reproaches, which lamentably, nearly all of the parishes in my little corner of South Texas ignore, make a stirring parallel to what the Lord did for His people during the Exodus and what we have done to Him on Good Friday. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
The prayers of the Roman Missal help stir up within our souls a deep love for God. When we love someone, we want to offer the very best we have for that person, not counting the cost. Should we not do the same for God? Should we not break open the fragrant spikenard and give generously and lovingly to the One who did not even spare His own Son for us?</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Some may say that engaging in learning the liturgy is time that could be well spent doing something else. Why do we need to learn, folks may ask, if it's just about the music. Others, like my two friends, would rather depend on what the publishing house suggests. Sadly, this kind of attitude would be reminiscent of the disciples who jeered at the woman. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Let us not be afraid to break open the spikenard so that, like the woman, whose generous act of love continues to be told even today, we may offer to the Lord what is "right and just."</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-65217283032884829852015-03-08T12:42:00.001-07:002015-03-08T12:47:14.763-07:00Cleansing the Temple<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9mz3c9kRkvUrbQ5E46TUZy_KYdHAVYZ7UUDRs49_TKus0G6-H8s8lAB4U6t2gn7LwzGry2JW0IC15GsdS4fHyUL9frFitBCoUOVB7-nXWawSuo-lnCkOlkDgHlXCCUcKooUfFafnquWg/s640/blogger-image-1517241658.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="394" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9mz3c9kRkvUrbQ5E46TUZy_KYdHAVYZ7UUDRs49_TKus0G6-H8s8lAB4U6t2gn7LwzGry2JW0IC15GsdS4fHyUL9frFitBCoUOVB7-nXWawSuo-lnCkOlkDgHlXCCUcKooUfFafnquWg/s400/blogger-image-1517241658.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Today's Gospel presents us with the account of Jesus cleansing the Temple. While not a few homilists have taken on the social justice mantle (Jesus was railing against profiting at the Temple), the celebrant at this morning's Mass took an entirely different approach. He focused on the sacred nature of worship space and how the activity that Jesus forcefully stopped went against the First Commandment.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
The celebrant reminded us that the space where the vendors and money exchangers set up shop was sacred, as it was the Court of the Gentiles. This space was set aside so that the Gentiles could come and worship the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Recall that Scripture calls it "a house of prayer for all people." Just because the area was not quite crowded with Gentiles, that did not mean that it was any less sacred than the rest of the Temple.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
The sacred mattered to Jesus. After all, as God, He was greatly concerned about what was going on in His house. The celebrant held that the same issue that concerned Jesus then concerns Him now. The Tabernacle, which holds the Blessed Sacrament, is greater than the Holy of Holies. How many times do we ignore Jesus in the Tabernacle when we enter the main body of the Church? How many times do we engage in meaningless conversations when He is right there, wanting us to engage with Him?</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
The medication that the former Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger wrote for the Ninth Station of the Cross seems to me to be an accurate diagnosis for the state of our liturgies today:</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
MEDITATION<br />
What can the third fall of Jesus under the Cross say to us? We have considered the fall of man in general, and the falling of many Christians away from Christ and into a godless secularism. Should we not also think of how much Christ suffers in his own Church? How often is the holy sacrament of his Presence abused, how often must he enter empty and evil hearts! How often do we celebrate only ourselves, without even realizing that he is there! How often is his Word twisted and misused! What little faith is present behind so many theories, so many empty words! How much filth there is in the Church, and even among those who, in the priesthood, ought to belong entirely to him! How much pride, how much self-complacency! What little respect we pay to the Sacrament of Reconciliation, where he waits for us, ready to raise us up whenever we fall! All this is present in his Passion. His betrayal by his disciples, their unworthy reception of his Body and Blood, is certainly the greatest suffering endured by the Redeemer; it pierces his heart. We can only call to him from the depths of our hearts: Kyrie eleison Lord, save us (cf. Mt 8: 25). </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
PRAYER<br />
Lord, your Church often seems like a boat about to sink, a boat taking in water on every side. In your field we see more weeds than wheat. The soiled garments and face of your Church throw us into confusion. Yet it is we ourselves who have soiled them! It is we who betray you time and time again, after all our lofty words and grand gestures. Have mercy on your Church; within her too, Adam continues to fall. When we fall, we drag you down to earth, and Satan laughs, for he hopes that you will not be able to rise from that fall; he hopes that being dragged down in the fall of your Church, you will remain prostrate and overpowered. But you will rise again. You stood up, you arose and you can also raise us up. Save and sanctify your Church. Save and sanctify us all.</blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
The homilist talked about the fact that the acred character of our liturgies needs to be respected. He cited weddings as one of those liturgies that tends to witness the most violations of the sacred. However, as excellent as all of his points were, he failed to make note of the fact that when we use substandard music, we FAIL to respect the sacred nature of the Mass. Weak music leads to weak liturgies and these lead to weak Faith.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
When the music takes on a horizontal nature, we run the risk of "celebrating our wonderful selves" as the late Fr. Richard John Neuhaus put it. One of the songs that the choir members wanted to use for this morning's Mass was "In These Days of Lenten Journey", written by Rev. Ricky Manalo, CSP, and published by OCP. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
In these days of Lenten journey, we have seen and we have heard the call to sow justice in the lives of those we serve. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
1. We reach out to those who are homeless to those who live without warmth. In the coolness of the evening we'll shelter their dreams, we will clothe them with mercy and peace. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
2. We open our eyes to the hungry and see the faces of Christ. As we nourish all people who huger for food, may their faith in our God be renewed. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
3. We open our eyes to the weary and hear the cry of the poor, to the voices that echo the song of despair, we will show our compassion and love. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
4. We call on the Spirit of Justice and pray for righteousness sake. We will sing for the freedom of all the oppressed; we will loosen the bonds of distress.</blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
The sentiments seem okay, but, the song glorifies what we are doing and speaks very little about our own need for God's mercy. It's about the "we" rather than the "He."</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Compare that with the Attende Domine:</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">Hear us, O Lord, and have mercy, because we have sinned against Thee.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">To Thee, highest King,</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">Redeemer of all,</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">do we lift up our eyes</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">in weeping:</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">Hear, O Christ, the prayers</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">of your servants.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">Right hand of the Father,</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">corner-stone,</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">way of salvation,</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">gate of heaven,</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">wash away our</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">stains of sin.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">We beseech Thee, God,</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">in Thy great majesty:</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">Hear our groans</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">with Thy holy ears:</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">calmly forgive</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">our crimes.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">To Thee we confess</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">our sins admitted</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">with a contrite heart</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">We reveal the things hidden:</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">By Thy kindness, O Redeemer,</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">overlook them.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">The Innocent, seized,</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">not refusing to be led;</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">condemned by false witnesses</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">because of impious men</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">O Christ, keep safe those</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">whom Thou hast redeemed.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">This hymn, the Par Excellence chant for Lent, drives home the point of the season, repentance. It is also not very hard to learn, contrary to what some of the choir members claimed. </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">People criticized Jesus because He actively took measures to cleanse His Father's house and restore the sacred nature of the Temple. Not a few of us have been criticized, even by priests, for caring about the restoration of the sacred nature of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. The sad thing is that there are those who care more about following what OCP says than what the Church says. There are those who are more interested in having music with a "meaningful message" than in providing for the sacred. </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #cccccc;">Aside from continuing the good fight, all we can say, as the former Cardinal Ratzinger wrote, is "save and sanctify your Church. Save and sanctify us all."</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="background-color: #ccccff;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-74437249388049090442015-02-18T19:05:00.001-08:002015-02-18T20:44:21.299-08:00Making it meaningful<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhE3HFHrxfzjX1wnpZWvPrkwa_hA10GGzqxfABvTJSwMxw69GkRlgYJu-iHCaWdcRd2xeLNjXQhA3RJEoLlFpKyD2H94eZE4k7nimoYEG0hHSDhKhUf5AFoxdypZPG81XW1kSkJ0NhgCf0/s640/blogger-image-416113211.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br /><img border="0" height="319" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhE3HFHrxfzjX1wnpZWvPrkwa_hA10GGzqxfABvTJSwMxw69GkRlgYJu-iHCaWdcRd2xeLNjXQhA3RJEoLlFpKyD2H94eZE4k7nimoYEG0hHSDhKhUf5AFoxdypZPG81XW1kSkJ0NhgCf0/s320/blogger-image-416113211.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Lent is my favorite time of the year. The haunting beauty of the chants, the smell of incense and the solemnity of the season bring a deep sense of joy into this penitential season.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
A few weeks ago, I met with a couple of friends to talk about liturgy. The conversation eventually turned to music. One friend of mine said that the music needed to be meaningful. He talked about a couple who sings their own compositions at Mass and he thought that these made the liturgy more meaningful because they had a "message."</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
It took a lot for me not to choke on my Dr. Pepper as my friend was saying this. The comments left me perplexed and rather saddened. The Mass already has a "message", it is the re-presentation of Our Lord's Sacrifice on Calvary. Even the Propers work to convey that fact, while stressing different aspects according to the readings and liturgical seasons. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
My friend's sentiments seem to echo, almost verbatim, those expressed by OCP whenever we enter a new liturgical season. "Make your parish's liturgies more meaningful", the emails from the publishing house stress. And yet, the music that OCP offers fails to respect the penitential nature of the season, focusing mostly on the horizontal aspects, rather than on the vertical, spiritual dimension. "Beyond the Days" by Fr. Ricky Manolo, CSP, is one such example. The song really doesn't really address the Lord at all. It talks about what "we" are doing, as opposed to what "He" is doing.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Contrast that with "Attende Domine" or "Parce Domine", which helps us to call to mind the heart of the Lenten season, our recognition of our sins and our desire for mercy. Both of these sacred chants encourage us to beseech God, asking him for mercy. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Then, there are the Propers for the Lenten season. Here is the Introit for Ash Wednesday, for example:</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Your mercy extends to all things, O Lord, and you despise none of the things you have made. You overlook the sins of men for the sake of repentance. You grant them your pardon, because you are the Lord our God. </blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Contrast that with one of OCP's suggested songs, "Ashes": </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
We rise again from the ashes, from the good we've failed to do. We rise again from ashes, to create ourselves anew. If all our world is ashes, then must our lives be true, an offering of ashes, an offering to you.</blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
This is vague. It really doesn't really carry much of a message. The song could be about anything, really. The piece pales in comparison to the actual texts that the Church gives us for the sacred liturgy. But, this is a chronic problem that afflicts OCP. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
I told my friend that there is a way to make the Mass "meaningful". "How", he asked. I told him that we could start by actually looking at what the Church asks us to sing, as opposed to what the publishing houses dictate that we should sing. "But, what about that couple whose music has a message", he persisted. I explained to him that if we examine the Propers, then we will find the "message" of the liturgy. Benedict once said that the liturgy is not something that "we cobble up for ourselves." It is something that we receive from the Church.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
By the end of our conversation, my friend wasn't quite convinced; however, he was somewhat intrigued by the notion that the Church has already given us a set of texts to use for every Mass. He seemed open to at least looking at the Propers. I hope that if he does peruse the Propers, he will find that they do "make" the Mass "more meaningful."</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-91495074429931607352014-12-06T20:34:00.001-08:002014-12-07T15:15:33.954-08:00Beware and Repair<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="270" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/zKZ4SqEy0J4" width="480"></iframe><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
For whatever reason, when a new liturgical year begins, folks tend to take this to mean that they can let loose the dogs of liturgical abuse, justifying it as experimentation.<br />
<br />
This certainly would hold true for St. Patrick's Parish in Seattle, Washington, as this video demonstrates. One could easily have mistaken this episode for a parody the likes of something Steve Colbert has done in the past. Unfortunately, this is not the case. <br />
<br />
As the former prefect for the Congregation for Divine Worship, Francis Cardinal Arinze, observed:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
There has never been a document from our Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments saying that dance is approved in the Mass. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Now, some priests and lay people think that Mass is never complete without dance. The difficulty is this: we come to Mass primarily to adore God -- what we call the vertical dimension. We do not come to Mass to entertain one another. That's not the purpose of Mass. The parish hall is for that. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
So all those that want to entertain us -- after Mass, let us go to the parish hall and then you can dance. And then we clap. But when we come to Mass we don't come to clap. We don't come to watch people, to admire people. We want to adore God, to thank Him, to ask Him pardon for our sins, and to ask Him for what we need. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
But when you introduce wholesale, say, a ballerina, then I want to ask you what is it all about. What exactly are you arranging? When the people finish dancing in the Mass and then when the dance group finishes and people clap -- don't you see what it means? It means we have enjoyed it. We come for enjoyment. Repeat. So, there is something wrong. Whenever the people clap -- there is something wrong -- immediately. When they clap -- a dance is done and they clap. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Most dances that are staged during Mass should have been done in the parish hall. And some of them are not even suitable for the parish hall. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I saw in one place -- I will not tell you where -- where they staged a dance during Mass, and that dance was offensive. It broke the rules of moral theology and modesty. Those who arranged it -- they should have had their heads washed with a bucket of holy water! [laughter] </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Why make the people of God suffer so much? Haven't we enough problems already? Only Sunday, one hour, they come to adore God. And you bring a dance! Are you so poor you have nothing else to bring us? Shame on you! </blockquote>
<br />
What was also disturbing were the other abuses that were heaped on to this one. There was no greeting after the "opening ritual". The dance infiltrated the Penitential Rite. The altar was moved off to the side as though it were a some sort of a stage prop. The priest (who wore his stole outside of his chasuble, something not allowed under the GIRM and reiterated by Redemptionis Sacramentum) stood off to the side, acting more as a spectator than as the celebrant who is supposed to be leading the faithful in prayer. The crucifix was missing. There was no discernible evidence of a Tabernacle. It is as though Christ was not the central figure of the Holy Sacrifice; the dance troupe was.<br />
<br />
The whole affair reminded me of a scene from Cecil B. DeMille's second version of the <i>Ten Commandments</i> (with Charlton Heston as Moses). After the Lord had given Moses the two tablets on which the commandments had been written, He admonished Moses to descend the mountain for the Hebrews had depraved themselves. Sure enough, once Moses had reached the base of the mountain, he was greeted by a loud ruckus, with people dancing around the Golden Calf. After having blasted Aaron for allowing this to happen and for smelting the "idol" (even though Aaron flatly denied it), Moses then laid his wrath upon the unfaithful lot.<br />
<br />
Abuse of the liturgy is abuse aimed at God. It violates the First Commandment that admonishes us to love and serve God FIRST. When folks make their own idiosyncrasies more important than what the liturgy mandates, they have turned their own "made-up" rites into an idol. Their "creation" becomes the Golden Calf. Sadly, pastors who allow this become like Aaron. They can blame their "pastoral associates" for making this stuff up, just as Aaron told Moses that he "threw the gold into the fire and the calf came out". These priests are just as much to blame as Aaron.<br />
<br />
Well did Cardinals Burke and Canizares-Lloera state that weak liturgies lead to weak faith. The parish in question has video history of these abusive practices. It is sad when one takes pride in disobedience, flaunting it for the world to see. As Redepmtionis Sacramentum states:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
6.] For abuses "contribute to the obscuring of the Catholic faith and doctrine concerning this wonderful sacrament".14 Thus, they also hinder the faithful from "re-living in a certain way the experience of the two disciples of Emmaus: 'and their eyes were opened, and they recognized Him'".15 For in the presence of God's power and divinity16 and the splendor of His goodness, made manifest especially in the Sacrament of the Eucharist, it is fitting that all the faithful should have and put into practice that power of acknowledging God's majesty that they have received through the saving Passion of the Only-Begotten Son.17 </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
[7.] Not infrequently, abuses are rooted in a false understanding of liberty. Yet God has not granted us in Christ an illusory liberty by which we may do what we wish, but a liberty by which we may do that which is fitting and right.18 This is true not only of precepts coming directly from God, but also of laws promulgated by the Church, with appropriate regard for the nature of each norm. For this reason, all should conform to the ordinances set forth by legitimate ecclesiastical authority. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
[8.] It is therefore to be noted with great sadness that "ecumenical initiatives which are well-intentioned, nevertheless indulge at times in Eucharistic practices contrary to the discipline by which the Church expresses her faith". Yet the Eucharist "is too great a gift to tolerate ambiguity or depreciation". It is therefore necessary that some things be corrected or more clearly delineated so that in this respect as well "the Eucharist will continue to shine forth in all its radiant mystery".19 </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
[9.] Finally, abuses are often based on ignorance, in that they involve a rejection of those elements whose deeper meaning is not understood and whose antiquity is not recognized. For "the liturgical prayers, orations and songs are pervaded by the inspiration and impulse" of the Sacred Scriptures themselves, "and it is from these that the actions and signs receive their meaning".20 As for the visible signs "which the Sacred Liturgy uses in order to signify the invisible divine realities, they have been chosen by Christ or by the Church".21 Finally, the structures and forms of the sacred celebrations according to each of the Rites of both East and West are in harmony with the practice of the universal Church also as regards practices received universally from apostolic and unbroken tradition,22 which it is the Church's task to transmit faithfully and carefully to future generations. All these things are wisely safeguarded and protected by the liturgical norms.</blockquote>
<br />
What is St. Patrick's transmitting to the faithful when it engages in these practices? Is it the True Faith of the Church or is it the parish's own idiosyncratic liturgical abuses that St. Patrick's is handing down?<br />
<br />
At this point, we must beware of invented practices that circumvent the sacred character of the Mass and we must repair the damage before we all suffer the fate of the Golden Calf. Kyrie Eleison.<br />
<br />
Update: Since the publication of this post, the video has now been labeled private. Nonetheless, I believe that the practices employed by this parish merit scrutiny and the intervention of the Archbishop of Seattle, the Most Rev. Peter J. Sartain. benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-44127995918652022832014-11-29T19:37:00.003-08:002014-11-29T19:37:08.979-08:00OCP's Grail Fail<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhryzD5x7UhNbfZTXt94lZbr7McaijJiQ03_qikSjl-BBqsx1bnQr_udPOTmqRSMJOS1T6uUoSVagzQ4MqVKbzuz6eRs8TKy2A-S_RouW1P5in7UXLAAfiFTmgKYHkQrgZOLWjP42HQg-o/s1600/IMG_2493-2.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhryzD5x7UhNbfZTXt94lZbr7McaijJiQ03_qikSjl-BBqsx1bnQr_udPOTmqRSMJOS1T6uUoSVagzQ4MqVKbzuz6eRs8TKy2A-S_RouW1P5in7UXLAAfiFTmgKYHkQrgZOLWjP42HQg-o/s1600/IMG_2493-2.JPG" height="320" width="240" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
When OCP touted composer Bob Hurd's new settings for the Grail Psalter, I met the news with some guarded optimism. I was hopeful that perhaps OCP and Hurd had both turned a page and that something sacred would finally come forth from the publishing house and its composer.<br />
<br />
The actual Grail Psalter is a beautifully translated text that is far superior to what we have in our present lectionaries. The language is sacred and unambiguous. Surely, such a sacred text deserves to be clothed in proper music. The music should be the light that highlights the beauty of the text and the salt that gives it taste.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, <i>Grail Psalms for Sunday Worship </i>does neither. The light it is supposed to shine towards the text winds up blinding it while too much salt kills the composition. In his introduction to the compilation, Hurd paraphrases from the <i>Introduction to the Lectionary</i>, writing that "the primary focus of the assembly during the Liturgy of the Word" is "meditation". He writes that "the responsorial psalm is key to this mediation, or 'chewing the cud' of the Word." He later explains the method he employed for his compositions:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"Given this distinctive role of the responsorial psalm, it seemed to me that its musical form could be distinctive, too: leaner than the usual song form, more proportionate to the unfolding readings, and most especially, more conducive to a meditative posture of chewing the cud of the Word. To accomplish this, I have blended chant and meter in these settings. The refrains are in a contemporary, metered style. The verses begin with chant tones and then turn back into metered music part way through in order to segue smoothly into the metered refrain."</blockquote>
While Hurd may have meant well, the compositions he created accomplish neither. Music is supposed to be the handmaid of the sacred liturgy, not the other way around. What Hurd wound up doing is to make the music matter more than the words that it is supposed to accentuate. <br />
<br />
His setting for Psalm 16, "Lord, You Will Show Us the Path of Life" repeats the refrain for the sake of the music, rather than letting the text speak for itself. The verses start off well, but, wind up turning into something that is more fit for a pop song than for the liturgy. The setting for Psalm 19: "Your Words, Lord, Are Spirit and Life" also falls into the same trap. There is no need to have the refrain repeated twice. The verses can be salvaged if the same chant tone for the first half can be carried into the second half. Psalm 90, "Fill Us with Your Love, O Lord and We Will Sing for Joy" carries with it an unnecessary repetition of the second half of the refrain. Hurd forces the text into his music instead of the other way around. He makes his musical setting more important than the words themselves. Psalm 63, "My Soul Is Thirsting for You, O Lord, My God" could have worked, however, the second half of the verse has too much of a contemporary feel and the musical interludes between the repeated refrain do not give it the character of a proper responsorial psalm. Psalm 40, "Here Am I Lord, I Come to Do Your Will" unnecessarily repeats the refrain. Rather than compose a clean and pure setting, Hurd adds too much salt to the composition, failing to give the text its proper seasoning. Psalm 34, "Taste and See the Goodness of the Lord" suffers from the same fate; its repetitive refrain does not really work. If the refrain is sung once between verses, then it could certainly work. Psalm 103, "The Lord is Kind and Merciful" (different from the one reviewed below) also carries the same double refrain that does not really help. The music is the same the setting reviewed below, however, the repetitive refrain would be a strike against it. Here, as in the other compositions, Hurd makes the music more important. It would have been better to compose a different setting instead of recycling one that he previously used. With the exception of those reviewed in the next paragraph, the rest of the Grail Psalm settings suffer from the same fate.<br />
<br />
There are some small glimmers of hope. Hurd's version of Psalm 23, "The Lord is My Shepherd" is perhaps one of the most passable of the group. He was able to keep some of the integrity of what the responsorial psalm is supposed to be like. However, even here, the over-use of instrumentation drowns out the beauty of the text. The verses are not as overloaded with music as is the setting for Psalm 23. Psalm 98, "The Lord Comes to Rule the Earth with Justice" is another one that seems hopeful; however, the verses would have to be tweaked as there is that over-emphasis on the music that leaves the words in the dust. Psalm 19, "Lord, You Have the Words of Everlasting Life" is perhaps the most hopeful. He does not repeat the text and he manages to preserve some semblance to what a responsporial psalm is supposed to sound like. With some tweaking of the second half of the verse, this could work. Psalm 103, "The Lord is Kind and Merciful, Slow to Anger and Rich in Compassion" is another one that is hopeful. With some minor tweaking of the second half of the verses, it could also work.<br />
<br />
Hurd would have been better off using the settings by Joseph Gelineau SJ for the Grail Psalter. Gelineau's settings are beautiful and quite in tune with the sacred character of the liturgy. They highlight the text, but do not overwhelm it. Even Owen Aslett would have been better suited for the task. <br />
<br />
I wish I could have found more psalms from Hurd's collection that would have been useful, but, after listening to the 27 compositions in their entirety, it was difficult as I could not chew the cud properly due to over seasoning.<br />
<br />
<br />benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-39685762188096980832014-11-09T21:01:00.001-08:002014-11-09T21:01:09.098-08:00The Real Pharisees<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-4SEZ55Lv5RVCv70cbW6sT1Oe6pt8mKPQMBgWptLqQgfQIF4C6-58wgN_eG8f4kw3TQwMsit2FL5SMekXnUbfS2Xi8PIbjiMoXQTKsaEFMV2Siz3VDQPteVia9Rcyb5b5P4htxSMH4P0/s1600/Sadducees-02.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-4SEZ55Lv5RVCv70cbW6sT1Oe6pt8mKPQMBgWptLqQgfQIF4C6-58wgN_eG8f4kw3TQwMsit2FL5SMekXnUbfS2Xi8PIbjiMoXQTKsaEFMV2Siz3VDQPteVia9Rcyb5b5P4htxSMH4P0/s1600/Sadducees-02.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
These past two weeks or so, the Gospel readings centered around Jesus' dealings with the Pharisees. In one form or another, the Pharisees try to trap Jesus, accusing Him of infractions with the law. The irony in this is that the Pharisees assail the Giver of the Law, Himself, without taking into account their own abuses.<br />
<br />
During the Babylonian Exile, there was a group of pious Jews which understood that the reason for their banishment was because Ancient Israel had repeatedly violated God's Law through its infidelity. This group became the <i>Perushim</i>, the separated, because they wanted to ensure a way to protect the Law so that Ancient Israel would not violate it. What the <i>Perushim</i> did was to build a hedge around the Law, devising minor ordinances to protect the precept that the Lord had given. <br />
<br />
Unfortunately, the <i>Perushim</i> (who evolved into the Pharisees) built such an elaborate hedge around the Law that they made these minor ordinances more important than what God had ordained. In other words, they added to the Law and valued their additions more than what came directly from the Lord, Himself. This is what Jesus railed against whenever he upbraided the Pharisees. The same group that was trying to protect the Law wound up violating it by additions they made on their own authority, not God's.<br />
<br />
In this day and age, we have our own Pharisees, but the identity of these folks is rather surprising. <br />
<br />
In a previous post, I wrote about the notion that not a few people have that those of us who care about liturgical integrity act like Pharisees. I have been accused of that a few times. The irony in all of this is that the very folks who level this charge against me (and others) are the same people who will defend usage of their liturgical innovations over the Church's norms. Just as the Pharisees were so meticulous in following their own idiosyncratic additions to the Law, these individuals firmly hold fast to their own liturgical creations and will not cede any ground, even when these practices run contrary to the Church's liturgical law.<br />
<br />
This is especially true in children's liturgies. Those who are in charge of planning these Masses tend to spend significant time rehearsing how the youngsters will gather around the altar and perform some sort of mime interpretation to the Pater Noster or how they will process up to the altar bearing globes and other objects for the offertory. Yet, the organizers tend to see little importance in having the students learn the sung Ordinary of the Mass or proper conduct during the liturgy itself. Liturgies for youth and some ecclesial movements fare no better. The latter tend to place more emphasis on the innovations that they have created as opposed to doing what the Church asks.<br />
<br />
We need to remember that the Mass is not our own personal property. We cannot do with it as we please. It is the Church's supreme act of worship with its very foundations going back to the time of Ancient Israel when the Lord dictated to Moses how He was to be worshipped. He strictly enjoined Ancient Israel not to deviate from these sacred practices. Lamentably, every time Ancient Israel committed an infraction against the Law, things went very badly for her. <br />
<br />
The Pharisees thought that they could improve on the Law and protect it by adding "sub laws" to it. They thought that their own innovations were helping things. Jesus gave them the short answer: "No." What they did was make their "improvements" more important than what God, Himself, had set forth.<br />
<br />
The new Pharisees seem to follow the same modus operandi. They seem to think that by adding their own personal stamp to the Mass, they have made it better. However, once again, the answer is a resounding "no". As Redemptionis Sacramentum reminds us:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;">[7.] Not infrequently, abuses are rooted in a false understanding of liberty. Yet God has not granted us in Christ an illusory liberty by which we may do what we wish, but a liberty by which we may do that which is fitting and right.<b>18</b> This is true not only of precepts coming directly from God, but also of laws promulgated by the Church, with appropriate regard for the nature of each norm.<b> </b>For this reason, all should conform to the ordinances set forth by legitimate ecclesiastical authority.</span> </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;">[8.] It is therefore to be noted with great sadness that "ecumenical initiatives which are well-intentioned, nevertheless indulge at times in Eucharistic practices contrary to the discipline by which the Church expresses her faith". Yet the Eucharist "is too great a gift to tolerate ambiguity or depreciation". It is therefore necessary that some things be corrected or more clearly delineated so that in this respect as well "the Eucharist will continue to shine forth in all its radiant mystery".<b>19</b></span> </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;">[9.] Finally, abuses are often based on ignorance, in that they involve a rejection of those elements whose deeper meaning is not understood and whose antiquity is not recognized. For "the liturgical prayers, orations and songs are pervaded by the inspiration and impulse" of the Sacred Scriptures themselves, "and it is from these that the actions and signs receive their meaning".<b>20</b> As for the visible signs "which the Sacred Liturgy uses in order to signify the invisible divine realities, they have been chosen by Christ or by the Church".<b>21</b> Finally, the structures and forms of the sacred celebrations according to each of the Rites of both East and West are in harmony with the practice of the universal Church also as regards practices received universally from apostolic and unbroken tradition,<b>22</b> which it is the Church's task to transmit faithfully and carefully to future generations. All these things are wisely safeguarded and protected by the liturgical norms.</span> </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;">[10.] The Church herself has no power over those things which were established by Christ Himself and which constitute an unchangeable part of the Liturgy.<b>23</b> Indeed, if the bond were to be broken which the Sacraments have with Christ Himself who instituted them, and with the events of the Church's founding,<b>24</b> it would not be beneficial to the faithful but rather would do them grave harm. For the Sacred Liturgy is quite intimately connected with principles of doctrine,<b>25</b> so that the use of unapproved texts and rites necessarily leads either to the attenuation or to the disappearance of that necessary link between the <i>lex orandi</i> and the <i>lex credendi.</i><b>26</b></span> </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;">[11.] The Mystery of the Eucharist "is too great for anyone to permit himself to treat it according to his own whim, so that its sacredness and its universal ordering would be obscured".<b>27</b> On the contrary, anyone who acts thus by giving free rein to his own inclinations, even if he is a Priest, injures the substantial unity of the Roman Rite, which ought to be vigorously preserved,<b>28</b> and becomes responsible for actions that are in no way consistent with the hunger and thirst for the living God that is experienced by the people today. Nor do such actions serve authentic pastoral care or proper liturgical renewal; instead, they deprive Christ's faithful of their patrimony and their heritage. For arbitrary actions are not conducive to true renewal,<b>29</b> but are detrimental to the right of Christ's faithful to a liturgical celebration that is an expression of the Church's life in accordance with her tradition and discipline. In the end, they introduce elements of distortion and disharmony into the very celebration of the Eucharist, which is oriented in its own lofty way and by its very nature to signifying and wondrously bringing about the communion of divine life and the unity of the People of God.<b>30</b> The result is uncertainty in matters of doctrine, perplexity and scandal on the part of the People of God, and, almost as a necessary consequence, vigorous opposition, all of which greatly confuse and sadden many of Christ's faithful in this age of ours when Christian life is often particularly difficult on account of the inroads of "secularization" as well.<b>31</b></span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial; font-size: small;"><b><br /></b></span>
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial;">Just as the Pharisees in Jesus' time caused confusion with their additions to the Law, so, too, do their liturgical descendants, with their creative innovations, contribute to the uncertainty and perplexity that Redemptionis Sacramentum warned against. </span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, Times, Arial;"><br /></span></div>
benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-72803138330886794112014-08-10T19:39:00.002-07:002014-08-10T19:39:37.495-07:00Disarming the Liturgical Winchester<div>
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.thinkbluela.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Chuck-Connors-Rifleman.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.thinkbluela.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Chuck-Connors-Rifleman.jpg" height="179" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
A few years ago, I took ill with a bad case of the flu. It necessitated my having to stay home for a couple of days. During my convalescence I stumbled upon a marathon of an old Western TV show called "The Rifleman". To say that Lucas McCain (portrayed by the late Chuck Conners) was sharp with that repeating Winchester was an understatement. That rifle went off more times per episode than I could count.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
From what I gathered, repeating rifles pretty much won the West and were quite useful for hunting and protection. The rapid-fire repeats were a life-saving necessity...</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
...but, not when it comes to the sacred liturgy.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
In his great opus <i>Tra Le Sollecitundini,</i> Pope St. Pius X warned against the dangers of mishandling liturgical texts when setting them to music. He strongly exhorted that </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
The liturgical text must be sung as it is in the books, without alteration or inversion of the words, without undue repetition, without breaking syllables, and always in a manner intelligible to the faithful who listen. </blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
In other words, the musical compositions need to respect the integrity of the liturgical texts and maintain the status quo.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Furthermore, the venerable Pontiff observed that:</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
It is not lawful to keep the priest at the altar waiting on account of the chant or the music for a length of time not allowed by the liturgy. According to the ecclesiastical prescriptions the Sanctus of the Mass should be over before the elevation, and therefore the priest must here have regard for the singers. The Gloria and the Credo ought, according to the Gregorian tradition, to be relatively short.</blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
These wise words, written 110 years ago, remain the standard used to govern our liturgical music and should be followed. Yet, there is a phenomena that crept into the Church with a vengeance over the course of the last 40 years, something that seems to be diametrically opposed to the instructions set forth by Pius X: the Responsorial Gloria.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjj78WqDDk5AxNjK3Vs1y5meGeGmBmRN2mBevLLXSBr1vZFGTL1WHYqzva6D5XkU9fodBURC0SzZIihfaq11r0RHq0NMAH7oU9xyrzNaedZcp07pLMOfEBriR-MAs_UYbiSd1x2h5j_6oI/s1600/Grumpy+Cat.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjj78WqDDk5AxNjK3Vs1y5meGeGmBmRN2mBevLLXSBr1vZFGTL1WHYqzva6D5XkU9fodBURC0SzZIihfaq11r0RHq0NMAH7oU9xyrzNaedZcp07pLMOfEBriR-MAs_UYbiSd1x2h5j_6oI/s1600/Grumpy+Cat.JPG" height="320" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Both OCP and GIA have assaulted parishes with various lackluster compositions that employ the "repeating Gloria." Marty Haugen, David Haas, Dan Schutte, Bob Hurd and several other composers have made use of this format of the Gloria with poor results. Schutte's "Mass of Christ the Savior" version of the Gloria sounds like the theme from "My Little Pony". Spanish versions of the "Responsorial Gloria" are equally horrid and the bilingual versions, which really are discouraged for use in liturgy, are cause for disdain, with one of the worst being "Missa Santa Cecilia" from OCP, which reduces the Gloria to a sound that can only be described as akin to "Latin Night" on Dancing with the Stars.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
The Gloria is a text that is meant to be prayed straight-through, either recited or chanted. Inserting a response to the Gloria breaks up the natural flow of the prayer. Just as it would sound strange to insert a refrain to the Gloria when it is recited, it is equally jarring to do the same thing when the prayer is set to music.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Furthermore, when the Congregation for Divine Worship released the revised translation of the Ordinary of the Mass, then-prefect Francis Cardinal Arinze warned national episcopal conferences that the Mass settings needed to be faithful to the text. He cited <i>Liturgiam Authenticam</i> No. 60, which notes that:</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
60. A great part of the liturgical texts are composed with the intention of their being sung by the priest celebrant, the deacon, the cantor, the people, or the choir. For this reason, the texts should be translated in a manner that is suitable for being set to music. Still, in preparing the musical accompaniment, full account must be taken of the authority of the text itself. Whether it be a question of the texts of Sacred Scripture or of those taken from the Liturgy and already duly confirmed, paraphrases are not to be substituted with the intention of making them more easily set to music, nor may hymns considered generically equivalent be employed in their place.39</blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
If we look at footnote 39, it references the General Instruction of the Roman Missal (GIRM), which specifically states that:</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
53. The Gloria in excelsis (Glory to God in the highest) is a most ancient and venerable hymn by which the Church, gathered in the Holy Spirit, glorifies and entreats God the Father and the Lamb. The text of this hymn may not be replaced by any other. It is intoned by the Priest or, if appropriate, by a cantor or by the choir; but it is sung either by everyone together, or by the people alternately with the choir, or by the choir alone. If not sung, it is to be recited either by everybody together or by two choirs responding one to the other.</blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Now, there will be some who will say, "But the documents don't prohibit a 'Responsorial Gloria'. Even the GIRM allows it!" Hold on partners, not so fast. "By the people alternately with the choir" does not necessarily mean that the people sing a refrain during the Gloria. If one has ever participated in the Liturgy of the Hours, one will note that praying "alternately" means that one side prays one part of the Psalm while the other side takes up the next part. In the case of the Gloria, this citation from the GIRM simply means that the choir can sing one portion of it and the faithful can join in with the other (but, not repeating the same thing). </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
In addition, the next statement reminds composers of the importance of setting the Ordinary to fitting music because: </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
61. Texts that are intended to be sung are particularly important because they convey to the faithful a sense of the solemnity of the celebration, and manifest unity in faith and charity by means of a union of voices.40</blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
These words are noble prayers and should be treated with the solemnity and dignity they convey. Using a setting that sounds like something from a Disney cartoon or a pop song does the liturgy a terrible disservice.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Now, insofar as bilingual Mass settings are concerned, these are not necessarily a good idea, especially when a "Responsorial Gloria" is employed. Pope Benedict addressed this issue in 2007 when he issued his Apostolic Exhortation, <i>Sacramentum Caritatis. </i>He noted that:</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
62. None of the above observations should cast doubt upon the importance of such large-scale liturgies. I am thinking here particularly of celebrations at international gatherings, which nowadays are held with greater frequency. The most should be made of these occasions. In order to express more clearly the unity and universality of the Church, I wish to endorse the proposal made by the Synod of Bishops, in harmony with the directives of the Second Vatican Council, (182) that, with the exception of the readings, the homily and the prayer of the faithful, it is fitting that such liturgies be celebrated in Latin. Similarly, the better-known prayers (183) of the Church's tradition should be recited in Latin and, if possible, selections of Gregorian chant should be sung. </blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Latin is the unifier because it is the language of the Church. When we split up the Gloria into a mishmash of English and Spanish or whatever combination of language is chosen, we run the risk of breaking up the important significance of the prayer and running the flow. It also runs the risk of unduly prolonging the prayer because, more often than not, this will include a "Responsorial Gloria", as evidenced in the dreaded "Missa Santa Cecilia". </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Repetition may work for rifles and learning, but, when it comes to the sacred liturgy, it is time that we fully disarm the Liturgical Winchester known as the "Responsorial Gloria."</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-8235399820080157812014-08-03T21:53:00.003-07:002014-08-03T21:53:52.161-07:00The Lowest Common Denominator<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhKlM1kOKDHxFZHU-vbvw55HAoDvvb2IOee67QlUbU-U9cCu4rmVRGspUMUFvknDHCk0GQqZeJRaFhYrSpqxdzjfOIspK0-OTClh5-BfEXeyAURR3KX-FI7N8gO5u5lDruBcPZZ2VkK8x0/s320/faith1eh3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhKlM1kOKDHxFZHU-vbvw55HAoDvvb2IOee67QlUbU-U9cCu4rmVRGspUMUFvknDHCk0GQqZeJRaFhYrSpqxdzjfOIspK0-OTClh5-BfEXeyAURR3KX-FI7N8gO5u5lDruBcPZZ2VkK8x0/s320/faith1eh3.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">H/T to Cartman who manages to capture the accuracy of a situation.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
In November 22, 1903, Pope St. Pius X issued his famous Motu Proprio on music in the sacred liturgy, Tra Le Sollecitudini. The Motu Proprio addressed the major problem of secular influences creeping into the sacred liturgy. At the time of the venerable Supreme Pontiff, opera started infiltrating the music used at the Mass. <br />
<br />
Pope St. Pius X wrote that:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Sacred music, being a complementary part of the solemn liturgy, participates in the general scope of the liturgy, which is the glory of God and the sanctification and edification of the faithful. It contributes to the decorum and the splendor of the ecclesiastical ceremonies, and since its principal office is to clothe with suitable melody the liturgical text proposed for the understanding of the faithful, its proper aim is to add greater efficacy to the text, in order that through it the faithful may be the more easily moved to devotion and better disposed for the reception of the fruits of grace belonging to the celebration of the most holy mysteries. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
The liturgical texts use beautiful, elevated language as a means of worshipping the Lord. Thus, the musical settings for these sacred texts should certainly provide fitting "clothing" for these words. While opera certainly has its elements of beauty, its profane nature does not lend itself to the solemn majesty and dignity that the liturgical rites require.</blockquote>
Now we hit the fast-forward button to the 21st century. Lamentably, the same issues that Pope St. Pius X sought to correct persist 110 years later, only now, the secular pop musical genre has replaced opera as the chief culprit. Rather than clothe the sacred liturgical texts with fitting music, this particular genre, especially the Praise and Worship style, tends to cheapen the solemn majesty of the liturgy with a casual tone that is more suitable for the Sirius XM pop stations than for the Mass.<br />
<br />
In 2003, another canonized Pontiff, Pope St. John Paul II, revisited this issue when he wrote his Chirograph on Sacred Music. The venerable Pope wrote that<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
3. On various occasions I too have recalled the precious role and great importance of music and song for a more active and intense participation in liturgical celebrations[9]. I have also stressed the need to "purify worship from ugliness of style, from distasteful forms of expression, from uninspired musical texts which are not worthy of the great act that is being celebrated"[10], to guarantee dignity and excellence to liturgical compositions. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
In this perspective, in the light of the Magisterium of St Pius X and my other Predecessors and taking into account in particular the pronouncements of the Second Vatican Council, I would like to re-propose several fundamental principles for this important sector of the life of the Church, with the intention of ensuring that liturgical music corresponds ever more closely to its specific function. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
4. In continuity with the teachings of St Pius X and the Second Vatican Council, it is necessary first of all to emphasize that music destined for sacred rites must have holiness as its reference point: indeed, "sacred music increases in holiness to the degree that it is intimately linked with liturgical action"[11]. For this very reason, "not all without distinction that is outside the temple (profanum) is fit to cross its threshold", my venerable Predecessor Paul VI wisely said, commenting on a Decree of the Council of Trent[12]. And he explained that "if music - instrumental and vocal - does not possess at the same time the sense of prayer, dignity and beauty, it precludes the entry into the sphere of the sacred and the religious"[13]. Today, moreover, the meaning of the category "sacred music" has been broadened to include repertoires that cannot be part of the celebration without violating the spirit and norms of the Liturgy itself. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
St Pius X's reform aimed specifically at purifying Church music from the contamination of profane theatrical music that in many countries had polluted the repertoire and musical praxis of the Liturgy. In our day too, careful thought, as I emphasized in the Encyclical Ecclesia de Eucharistia, should be given to the fact that not all the expressions of figurative art or of music are able "to express adequately the mystery grasped in the fullness of the Church's faith"[14]. Consequently, not all forms of music can be considered suitable for liturgical celebrations.</blockquote>
St. John Paul II stressed the importance of maintaining continuity with St. Pius X meaning that the essence of the 1903 Motu Proprio's teaching has not changed. What was problematic then remains problematic now. For whatever reasons, banal music crept into the Mass immediately after the Second Vatican Council with such insipid and uninspired compositions as "You are Near", "Glory and Praise" and "Sing to the Mountains". Recently, compositions such as "Rain Down", "Table of Plenty", "Bread of Life", and other stuff from OCP's "Spirit and Song" collections have also seeped into the Mass, especially within those liturgies "targeted" towards youth.<br />
<br />
Oddly enough, the Fathers of the 2005 Synod on the Eucharist echoed the similar observation that both Sts. Pius X and John Paul II made when they issued their Instrumentum Laboris:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
In other responses some lamented the poor quality of translations of liturgical texts and many musical texts in current languages, maintaining that they lacked beauty and were sometimes theologically unclear, thereby contributing to a weakening of Church teaching and to a misunderstanding of prayer. A few responses made particular mention of music and singing at Youth Masses. In this regard, it is important to avoid musical forms which, because of their profane use, are not conducive to prayer. Some responses note a certain eagerness in composing new songs, to the point of almost yielding to a consumer mentality, showing little concern for the quality of the music and text, and easily overlooking the artistic patrimony which has been theologically and musically effective in the Church’s liturgy.</blockquote>
Incidentally, while the Fathers specifically mentioned the problem with "Youth Masses", their observation is not merely limited to this particular matter. At least in the United States, the music used in Spanish-language liturgies is just as problematic, if not worse. Sadly, OCP is also the chief culprit. In most cases, the genre of music used ranges anywhere from Mariachi to Caribbean to Ranchero and everything in between. Even the texts tend to be problematic, as some of the compositions, such as "Pueblos Nuevos" seem to be inflicted with tinges of Liberation Theology. This certainly contributes to a "weakening of Church teaching and to a misunderstanding of prayer" that the Synod Fathers warned against.<br />
<br />
In 2007, Pope Benedict XVI, in his Apostolic Exhortation, Sacramentum Caritatis, maintained this hermeneutic of continuity with the teachings on sacred music held by his predecessors when he wrote that:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
42. In the ars celebrandi, liturgical song has a pre-eminent place. (126) Saint Augustine rightly says in a famous sermon that "the new man sings a new song. Singing is an expression of joy and, if we consider the matter, an expression of love" (127). The People of God assembled for the liturgy sings the praises of God. In the course of her two-thousand-year history, the Church has created, and still creates, music and songs which represent a rich patrimony of faith and love. This heritage must not be lost. Certainly as far as the liturgy is concerned, we cannot say that one song is as good as another. Generic improvisation or the introduction of musical genres which fail to respect the meaning of the liturgy should be avoided. As an element of the liturgy, song should be well integrated into the overall celebration (128). Consequently everything -- texts, music, execution -- ought to correspond to the meaning of the mystery being celebrated, the structure of the rite and the liturgical seasons (129). Finally, while respecting various styles and different and highly praiseworthy traditions, I desire, in accordance with the request advanced by the Synod Fathers, that Gregorian chant be suitably esteemed and employed (130) as the chant proper to the Roman liturgy (131). </blockquote>
Unfortunately, this particularly important teaching has been lost on composers and publishing houses and those at both the diocesan and parochial level who oversee liturgical music. It is as though all four groups, with some rare exceptions, tend to resort to the lowest common denominator when it comes to selecting music for the Mass. Sadly, a lot of what these folks promote and use winds up sounding like Faith +1, the pseudo Praise and Worship band featuring South Park character Cartman and his animated cohorts. The baselines, drums and keyboards may sound great on the radio, but, it is hardly a joyfully sacred noise.<br />
<br />
According to Pope St. Pius X (and repeatedly affirmed by his successors, most notably, Venerable Pope Pius XII, St. John Paul II and Benedict XVI):<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Sacred music should consequently possess, in the highest degree, the qualities proper to the liturgy, and in particular sanctity and goodness of form, which will spontaneously produce the final quality of universality. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
It must be holy, and must, therefore, exclude all profanity not only in itself, but in the manner in which it is presented by those who execute it. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
It must be true art, for otherwise it will be impossible for it to exercise on the minds of those who listen to it that efficacy which the Church aims at obtaining in admitting into her liturgy the art of musical sounds.</blockquote>
<br />
The aforementioned "Rain Down" sounds more like a piece that one would hear at a jazz bar than within the context of the sacred liturgy. "Alabare" sounds more like a Ranchera-type piece that one could listen to at a fiesta, but, not at Mass. <br />
<br />
St. John Paul II echoed his venerable predecessor's words when he noted that:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
12. With regard to compositions of liturgical music, I make my own the "general rule" that St Pius X formulated in these words: "The more closely a composition for church approaches in its movement, inspiration and savour the Gregorian melodic form, the more sacred and liturgical it becomes; and the more out of harmony it is with that supreme model, the less worthy it is of the temple"[33]. It is not, of course, a question of imitating Gregorian chant but rather of ensuring that new compositions are imbued with the same spirit that inspired and little by little came to shape it. Only an artist who is profoundly steeped in the sensus Ecclesiae can attempt to perceive and express in melody the truth of the Mystery that is celebrated in the Liturgy[34]. In this perspective, in my Letter to Artists I wrote: "How many sacred works have been composed through the centuries by people deeply imbued with the sense of mystery! The faith of countless believers has been nourished by melodies flowing from the hearts of other believers, either introduced into the Liturgy or used as an aid to dignified worship. In song, faith is experienced as vibrant joy, love and confident expectation of the saving intervention of God"[35]. </blockquote>
Thus, for St. John Paul II, the issue of sacred music for the Mass was not an "anything goes" style; rather, it needs to be "worthy...of the temple." It needs to "perceive and express in melody the truth of the Mystery that is celebrated in the Liturgy."<br />
<br />
We cannot and should not settle for the lowest common denominator when it comes to the Mass. When we use substandard music, pieces that fail to respect the dignity of the Mass, we contribute to the erosion of the solemnity of the Sacred Liturgy.<br />
<br />
Authentic sacred music, such as Chant (Propers come to mind), enhances the beauty of the liturgy and allows our minds and hearts to be elevated to the sublime Mysteries that unfold before us. It brings us in tune with the heavenly realities that unfold before us. It is too precious to be relegated to the lowest common denominator.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<br />benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-64194771264004588232014-07-27T14:33:00.003-07:002014-07-27T14:33:38.618-07:00Recognizing the beauty in the old and the new<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.holyghostcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/ad_orientem-pope_benedict.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.holyghostcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/ad_orientem-pope_benedict.jpg" height="237" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
The readings which the Church presents to us for the 17th Sunday in Ordinary Time give us a rich plethora of interpretations; however, one theme that we can extract from them is the idea of the hermeneutic of continuity, a concept vividly manifested by Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI especially in his teachings concerning the liturgy.<br />
<br />
In the first reading, young King Solomon asks the Lord to bless him with the gift of wisdom so that he can properly govern his vast kingdom. In a sense, we see some continuity between Solomon and his father, the great King David. God considered David a man after his own heart, despite the fact that the king had committed a plethora of sins against the Lord. David wanted to rule over Israel properly and he had a profound love for the Lord. Solomon (at least towards the beginning of his reign) also manifested a deep love for God. It fell to him to build the great Temple and he lavished it with the finest of materials. I suppose one could say that Solomon initiated the concept of beauty in worship. <br />
<br />
Today's Gospel account carries on that theme of continuity, and, in a sense, beauty. The merchant who finds a pearl of great price sells everything he has to buy it. He rejoices because it is a thing of beauty. Beauty has a way of piercing through the heart and the soul. It moves us and overwhelms us. It gives us a foretaste of the beauty of God. <br />
<br />
It is the final part of today's Gospel that struck me, though. It was as if Jesus were speaking directly about the current state of affairs insofar as liturgy is concerned:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
(H)e said to them, "Therefore every scribe who has been trained for the kingdom of heaven is like a householder who brings out of his treasure what is new and what is old."</blockquote>
<br />
Those of you who read Fr. Timothy Finigan's excellent blog, "The Hermeneutic of Continuity", will recognize the above scriptural quote, as it appears on the masthead of his site. Benedict XVI often made references to this same quote when applying the concept of the hermeneutic of continuity to the Second Vatican Council. Even in his pre-papal writings and thought, Benedict consistently held that the Council's teachings were not a rupture with what the Church has always traditionally held and taught, even though there has been, lamentably, a hermeneutic of rupture.<br />
<br />
From the beginning of his eight-year reign as Supreme Pontiff, Benedict embodied that "householder who brings out of his treasure what is new and what is old." The Papal Masses took on a more sacred character. Gregorian Chant was used, even in papal liturgies celebrated around the world (with the glaringly bad example of the Mass celebrated in Washington, DC and a World Youth Day liturgy). Beautiful vestments that had not seen the light of day in generations returned to the altar, and, for the first time in what seemed like ages, Mass at the Sistine Chapel was celebrated Ad Orientem.<br />
<br />
Perhaps the biggest manifestation of the bringing out of the old and the new was in 2007 when Benedict released Summorum Pontificum, the Motu Proprio which liberalized the celebration of the Mass in the Extraordinary Form (using the 1962 Missal). Benedict envisioned that there could very well be mutual enrichment between the Ordinary Form (the current Mass) and the Extraordinary Form. To a certain extent, this has happened in quite a few parishes. In parishes that offer both forms of the Mass to the faithful, one can certainly see the fruits of the Motu Proprio. The majestic elements of the Extraordinary Form (sacred music, incense, vestments) have permeated into the Ordinary Form, adding to this liturgy a greater sense of the solemn and the sublime. Having been to two parishes (not in my local area) that have implemented this, I can say that such liturgies elevate the heart and mind to heaven and penetrate the heart with an indescribable joy, a joy that is not passing, but that remains firmly implanted in one's spirit.<br />
<br />
Sadly, for those of us who consider the Holy Eucharist to be our most beautiful pearl of great price, we have yet to experience this hermeneutic of continuity at the level of both the Local and Particular Churches. We have yet to witness the householder bring out of our Church's sacred treasury both the old and the new. Instead, we are subjected to an ars celebrandi that is at the lowest common denominator, with substandard music that glorifies the horizontal (as opposed to lifting our hearts to the vertical nature of worship) and a casual treatment of the sacred character of the liturgy. Even our youth do not get to experience any part of the sublime majesty of the Mass. Instead, they are treated to religious music that sounds more like something out of their average secular pop station.<br />
<br />
Solomon prayed for a heart that would be full of wisdom and understanding and God granted him this favor. He used his wisdom and understanding to both rule wisely over his people and, more importantly, to build the Lord a temple that was fit for divine worship. He used the gifts that God had given him to construct something beautiful so that Ancient Israel could offer the Lord proper worship. <br />
<br />
The Church is the New Israel. Her concept of worship does not vary, in theory, from that of Ancient Israel. In fact, she brings Ancient Israel's form of worship to completion within the context of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. If we look at the elements of the Church's form of liturgical worship, we will find that they have their roots in Ancient Israel's cultic forms. When Christ instituted the Holy Eucharist, he gave us the fullest example of bringing out what is old and what is new. St. Thomas Aquinas wrote that the old form, the offering up of the paschal lamb, was replaced with the oblation of the real Paschal Lamb; yet, the elements of sacrificial worship are retained.<br />
<br />
The Holy Eucharist is our pearl of great price because it is no less than Christ Jesus, Himself. Let us not shun away from what is old and venerable when it comes to worshipping our Lord; rather, let us unite both the old and the new for in them, we have our fulfillment.benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-1807920475253082162014-07-20T19:55:00.000-07:002014-07-20T19:57:37.028-07:00A Peaceful Oasis<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgrfesjdwOuk1N-txp0j5Dgi0Qf2QvfOsfXFZXzKTSXhjsJiukxzoV3cVVT9aP4j0L-dJpnOPdXDIQ7UQfQYGvnk1f35MNSimZ9rb3zrpA3RghFKOKewWUF5IOAvcIxOs7m5vmKxtCgGOs/s1600/IMG_2108.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgrfesjdwOuk1N-txp0j5Dgi0Qf2QvfOsfXFZXzKTSXhjsJiukxzoV3cVVT9aP4j0L-dJpnOPdXDIQ7UQfQYGvnk1f35MNSimZ9rb3zrpA3RghFKOKewWUF5IOAvcIxOs7m5vmKxtCgGOs/s1600/IMG_2108.jpg" height="320" width="240" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
About two weeks ago, one of my dearest friends paid me a visit to celebrate Fourth of July. We took a road trip to Pharr, Texas, to visit St. Jude's Parish and Shrine. The experience was extraordinary.<br />
<br />
For several weeks, I have been experiencing so much pain and sadness on many levels. For a while, it almost seemed as though this trip would never come. But, when my friend stepped off the escalator, I felt such joy.<br />
<br />
The joy hit its zenith when we got to Pharr and spent time with the Oratorians, the priests who serve St. Jude's. Their charism is very liturgical. They bring to reality the beauty of the sacred liturgy, as taught by Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI. Almost immediately, I began to experience a profound peace.<br />
<br />
We had Mass in the Extraordinary Form. One does not need to have a hand missal to follow along. All one needs is a heart and soul willing to take in the beauty of this form of the Mass and a spirit eager to unite itself in prayer with the celebrant. I cried, but, it was not because of the profound sadness that I had been experiencing prior to the trip. The tears were more of a release. It was a deep sense of interior peace that I had not experienced in years. After Mass, we spent time with the Oratorians and the seminarians. They radiated joy. Even the parish pets were joyful. <br />
<br />
On Sunday, we returned to St. Jude's for Mass. This time, I experienced the Ordinary Form in Latin (readings and homily were preached in the vernacular, in this case English). The chants were in Latin as well and Mass was celebrated Ad Orientem. Two children were going to receive Holy Communion for the first time. It was the first time that I had experienced the liturgy as Vatican II really meant for it to be. I had been in a liturgical desert for so long that this particular liturgy was a most welcome oasis. The chants were familiar as were the prayers. Even the first communicants and their families were praying. The Gospel reading was particularly applicable to my situation: "Come to me all who labor and are heavy burdened and I will give you rest." The Lord knew my deep struggles and led this weary black sheep to a place of refreshment. In the homily, the celebrant talked about how the Lord continues to give us strength for our trials and tribulations through the Holy Eucharist. At the Offertory, we sang Jesu Dulcis Memoria. Everything was new and yet familiar. During the Eucharistic prayer, I cried again, more tears of joy flowed. I prayed with all my heart, asking the Lord to please stay with me and help me through my trials. <br />
<br />
After Mass, I paid a visit to the outdoor shrine. It was silent and peaceful. People brought their concerns, struggles and troubles to St. Jude. I joined them, lighting my candle and asking the holy Apostle for his assistance.<br />
<br />
Before dropping my friend off at the airport, I thanked him for coming and for giving me the opportunity to experience such profound peace. After his plane took off, I drove back to Pharr. I met up with the Oratorians and thanked the Fathers once more for the profound experience. <br />
<br />
Like St. Peter, I did not want to leave Mount Tabor. I did not want to face the trials and tribulations that awaited me in Laredo. But, the experience remains engraved in my heart and in my soul. A few days after the trip, I was dealt a very difficult blow and yet, what I experienced in Pharr is sustaining me. Yes, I have been frustrated because of this precarious situation, but, something happened to me at St. Jude's that I cannot explain.<br />
<br />
The Oratorians, with their love and gracious hospitality, gave me the opportunity to experience the beauty and the majesty of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. They proved Pope Benedict's point about the importance of beauty and are celebrandi in the sacred liturgy. I know that I have to contend with liturgical messes down here; however, I know that I have a welcome respite from the madness just two hours away.benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-71234176482524603272014-06-08T20:48:00.004-07:002014-06-08T20:48:56.829-07:00Peter returns to the Cenacle<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://media2.newsobserver.com/smedia/2014/05/26/13/50/157-hWkAK.AuSt.55.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://media2.newsobserver.com/smedia/2014/05/26/13/50/157-hWkAK.AuSt.55.jpeg" height="213" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
Seven weeks ago, we entered into the Paschal Triduum with the Evening Mass of the Lord's Supper, wherein Christ instituted both the Sacraments of the Eucharist and Holy Orders in the Upper Room, also known as the Cenacle.<br />
<br />
On the eve of His Passion, Jesus directed two of the Apostles (Peter presumably being one of them), to go and prepare the Upper Room for the Passover Supper. In a sense, one could say that Christ was sending his liturgical ministers ahead of him to ready the Cenacle for the first liturgy of the New Covenant. Peter and his companion follow the prescriptions of the law in their preparations because the Passover Supper is one of Ancient Israel's most sacred liturgical acts.<br />
<br />
As the Apostles take their seats, they anticipate that the Passover ritual will be as it had been ever since the time of Moses; however, Jesus, as the new Moses, establishes a new ritual, a new covenant. Instead of eating the roasted flesh of a pure, spotless lamb, the true Lamb presides over the fulfillment of the Passover meal. The ritual that the Lord had commanded Ancient Israel to follow is now fully actualized in the actions of His only Begotten Son. The ancient form is now supplanted by its true fulfillment. The Lamb, Himself, is offering His own Body and Blood. <br />
<br />
During Pope Francis' recent visit to the Holy Land, one can say that Peter, in the person of the Supreme Pontiff, has returned to the place where it all began. He has returned to offer the same Sacrifice that Christ offered so long ago. This occasion was certainly not lost on the Holy Father, who, in his homily, noted that:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
The Upper Room reminds us, through the Eucharist, of sacrifice. In every Eucharistic celebration Jesus offers himself for us to the Father, so that we too can be united with him, offering to God our lives, our work, our joys and our sorrows… offering everything as a spiritual sacrifice.</blockquote>
<br />
While he devoted the bulk of his homily to the fact that the Holy Spirit, rushed into the Upper Room on that first Pentecost Sunday, I believe that the offering of that First Eucharist really drives at the heart of the Church. Jesus shared one final Eucharist with the 11 before His Ascension. St. Luke makes that observation in the first chapter of the Acts of the Apostles when he writes that:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
And eating together with them, he commanded them, that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but should wait for the promise of the Father, which you have heard (saith he) by my mouth.</blockquote>
<br />
Other than the account of the Last Supper, the only other time that St. Luke records Jesus "eating" with his Apostles is when he begins the supper at Emmaus. Once he breaks the bread, he disappears from the sight of Cleopas and the other disciple. With this final "meal", this final Eucharist, Jesus wanted to remind the surviving 11 that this was how he would remain with them until his return. <br />
<br />
After the Ascension, when the 11 return to the Upper Room, it would seem to me that St. Peter, himself, would preside over the Eucharist and lead the 11 and the Blessed Virgin Mary in prayer throughout the course of nine days as they awaited for the Paraclete to come. Nourished by Our Lord, they would be ready to receive the Holy Spirit and boldly go forth and evangelize, as Christ had commanded them to do so.<br />
<br />
For me, Pope Francis' celebration of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass in the very place where it all began was the most significant moment of his trip to the Holy Land. Peter had returned to the Church's roots. As Pope Francis said in the beginning of his homily, the Church "preserves the memory of what happened here." However, she does more than preserve that memory. At every Mass, she returns to that precise moment. She returns to the heart of the Paschal Mystery.<br />
<br />
According to long-standing tradition, King David is buried beneath the Upper Room. There is deep significance to this. In his psalms, David predicted the sufferings of the Messiah, the very sufferings that Jesus anticipated in his Eucharistic Sacrifice on Holy Thursday. Little did David know that the descendent that the Lord had promised him, sprung from his own loins, would offer himself as a holocaust for our salvation over the very spot were the beloved Old Testament king was buried. Little did David know that directly over his grave would stand His own Lord, who would rule over his kingdom forever.<br />
<br />
At every Mass, we return to the Upper Room. We become just as present at the Eucharistic Sacrifice as the Apostles were. Pope Francis tells us that "All the saints drew from this source; and hence the great river of the Church’s holiness continues to flow: from the Heart of Christ, from the Eucharist and from the Holy Spirit." <br />
<br />
For Peter, in the person of Pope Francis, it was the moment of returning, rediscovering and rejoicing. May it be the same for all of us at every Mass.benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-49467630827626995712014-06-08T20:15:00.000-07:002014-06-08T20:15:52.482-07:00The Elevation of Woman<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjXob-M83UQ6O0o2ACOd1Reuze1sQY9tVh5UwpjVFkbpsFWbyH-ebtWlM4ecmju_kIohbkKJi8ua7sVpp8sn_GTsoC-S_e5eN6DwHr_KfSAwnM97eKpe0NcbXAnkrUF0vE4xm4B6hyphenhyphen6nvI/s640/blogger-image--1297884373.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="248" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjXob-M83UQ6O0o2ACOd1Reuze1sQY9tVh5UwpjVFkbpsFWbyH-ebtWlM4ecmju_kIohbkKJi8ua7sVpp8sn_GTsoC-S_e5eN6DwHr_KfSAwnM97eKpe0NcbXAnkrUF0vE4xm4B6hyphenhyphen6nvI/s320/blogger-image--1297884373.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 16px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">On May 31st, the Church celebrated the Memorial of the visitation of the Blessed Virgin Mary to her kinswoman Elizabeth. </span></div>
<div style="font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;"></span><br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 16px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">This feast is rich in meaning. It reminds us that Mary is the true Ark of the Covenant, as her journey from Nazareth calls to mind the journey of the Ark from the northern part of Israel to the land of Judah. Tiny St. John the Baptist leaps for joy, much as David did, when the true Presence of God stood before him. </span></div>
<div style="font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;"></span><br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 16px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">St. John Paul II would use this feast to release an annual letter to women. I think that Benedict XVI maintained the practice; however, I do not know if Pope Francis has continued it. Nonetheless, it has been Francis' actions that have borne solid witness to the authentic role of women in the Church.</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;"></span><br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 16px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">Much has been written about the ongoing, almost soap opera-like saga of the members of the Leadership Council of Women Religious (LCWR). Their words and actions seem to me to be in imitation of the first Eve, seeking to snatch power and engaging in a prideful claim that they know more than the Magisterium. Gerhard Cardinal Muller rightly corrected them, even apologizing for his use of strong language. When the members of the LCWR were seeking support from Pope Francis, they found none. He had confirmed the warnings and admonishments that Muller had given them.</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;"></span><br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 16px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">While I do admit to struggling with Pope Francis' definition of humility, I do think that he is on to something, especially where it concerns the LCWR and women, in general. Christ founded the Church, His Bride. Just as a bride submits to her husband, so, too, does the Church, the Bride, submit to her Divine Spouse, Christ. This submission is not something evil or masochist; it is a submission done in love. Christ submitted Himself to us and we nailed Him to the cross by our sinful actions. Nonetheless, He bathed the Church with His own blood and cleansed her wounds. Our actions, as evil as they are, do not diminish His love for us; however, they run the risk of diminishing our love for Him.</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;"></span><br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 16px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">The LCWR is no different than the women who advocate priestly ordination for themselves. They fail to recognize the unique and holy position that Christ and the Church have for them. They cannot get past the pride of the first Eve and they wind up rejecting the holiness and humility of the New Eve. When the Blessed Virgin Mary prays the Magnificat, she is not praising herself. From the very beginning, Mary acknowledged her role as the "handmaid of the Lord" and renders her Fiat to God. She who holds the highest honor that God could ever bestow upon a woman, being both His Mother and His first disciple, receives her divine Motherhood with the greatest of humility, awe and reverence.</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;"></span><br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 16px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">Jesus also bestowed an honor to another woman, St. Mary Magdalene, by permitting her to be the Apostle to the Apostles. He entrusts her to impart the glorious news of His resurrection to St. Peter and the surviving 11 Apostles. As the messenger, she does not overshadow the message, but, passes it on in humble obedience to the Lord. The holy and faithful women who have shed their blood for Christ and His Church did not make the ultimate sacrifice of martyrdom to bring about glory for themselves, nor did they seek after something that was not theirs. St. Agnes told her suitor that she was betrothed to Christ. She and her sister martyrs chose to unite themselves to Christ, preferring Him to any other earthly power or enticement.</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;"></span><br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 16px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">The Feast of the Visitation reminds us where our priorities should be, whether we are male or female. It means that Christ comes first in our lives. It means that we are all called to be Christ-bearers to the world. It means that, like the tiny St. John the Baptist, we are to be joyful messengers. We do not snatch and claw at divinity and demand things of Christ and of the Church that are not ours; rather, like the Virgin Mary and like St. Elizabeth, we receive with humble joy the greatest gift that God has for us, Himself.</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 16px; min-height: 19px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;"></span><br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
</div>
<div style="font-size: 16px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">It is sad that many of the LCWR members have chosen to move "beyond the Church and beyond Jesus". It is just as disheartening that those women who demand ordination cannot see the dignity and beauty of their station as daughters of the Church. May they, through the intercession of the Blessed Mother, St. Elizabeth, St. Mary Magdalene, St. Agnes and all holy women, learn to accept the beauty that exists as a woman in the Church.</span></div>
benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-30915509328602668012014-05-29T21:38:00.000-07:002014-05-29T21:38:11.941-07:00Restoring Thursday<div>
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEje2c_3uRkewRMYPHdP_h0i9wQ84F1zOM6n-39xS6wWl1a4GYCmfDTCZ1u1QpU6kDJs76vvS9BxuVttdIzMWp9JwfsN0MaHDuOPBmZv9FPztUsQ6Nt0ESzVhYDlCLqmySS906bFZO2tW1o/s640/blogger-image--1910874526.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEje2c_3uRkewRMYPHdP_h0i9wQ84F1zOM6n-39xS6wWl1a4GYCmfDTCZ1u1QpU6kDJs76vvS9BxuVttdIzMWp9JwfsN0MaHDuOPBmZv9FPztUsQ6Nt0ESzVhYDlCLqmySS906bFZO2tW1o/s640/blogger-image--1910874526.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Thursday bears a special significance for the Church. It was on a Thursday that Christ instituted the sacraments of the Holy Eucharist and the Priesthood. Traditionally, it was on a Thursday when Christ ascended to the heavens, mounting his throne amidst shouts of joy from the angels. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Up until the year 2000, Texas had celebrated the Solemnity of the Ascension on its traditional day, Thursday, exactly 40 days after Easter. Unfortunately, the bishops reached the decision to translate this very important day from its biblically traditional date to the closest Sunday. The usual suspect for this particular line of thinking was that it was for "pastoral" reasons. Sadly, sometimes even pastoral decisions are not always the best ones.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
When we begin to tinker with sacred liturgical time, we lose sight of the deeper meaning behind why, for nearly two millennia, the Church celebrated this feast when she did (although certain places, praise God, still maintain the tradition). The number 40 holds a special designation for Ancient Israel and the New Israel, which is the Church. Noah and the occupants of the ark endured the Great Flood for 40 days. Ancient Israel wandered in the desert for 40 years. The Blessed Virgin Mary and St. Joseph presented the infant Jesus in the Temple 40 days after His birth. Jesus spent 40 days in the desert fasting and praying, vanquishing Satan and his temptations towards the end. As St. Luke tells us in the beginning of the Acts of the Apostles, for 40 days after his triumphant Resurrection, Christ instructed the surviving 11 Apostles, spending no little time with them to prepare them for the great work that lay ahead.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
On the 40th day, Thursday, St. Luke tells us that Christ has been "at table" with the Apostles. In St. Luke's Gospel, this "table" connection appears another time: Emmaus. Jesus is at "table" with Cleopas and the other disciple when He breaks the bread, revealing who He is. Jesus has one more liturgy with His Apostles, telling them that they must now look to Him in the Eucharist. And, when did He first reveal Himself in the Eucharist? It happened on Holy Thursday. Again, we see the connection between Holy Thursday and Ascension Thursday.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Jesus reminds them to "do this in memory of Me", to celebrate the Holy Eucharist. He returns them to the place where it first took place. Then, he leads them to Mount Olivet, the site of His agony in the Garden. That sorrowful night was the last time that 10 of them probably saw Him before the soldiers took him away. Now, this would be the last time that the 11 would physically see Christ on this Earth. Jesus enjoins them to remain in Jerusalem until the Holy Spirit comes upon them. The same men who left Mount Olivet in fear the night Jesus was betrayed would burst forth from the Upper Room with courage and zeal, bearing witness to Christ "not only in Jerusalem, but throughout Judea and Samaria, and indeed, to the ends of the Earth."</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Then, Christ blesses them for the last time and then, on His own power, He is lifted up while the Apostles look up and a cloud removes Him from sight. Two angels appear to the 11 and tell them that Jesus will come back in the same way just as they had seen him ascend. The Apostles then return to the Upper Room, joined by the Blessed Mother, and begin the first novena, engaging themselves in nine days of prayer. On the fiftieth day, the Holy Spirit descends upon them, bursting into the Upper Room and literally inflaming the hearts of the Apostles, while Mary, who was already full of the Holy Spirit, witnesses the launch of the Church.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Biblically, numerically and liturgically, Thursday needs to be preserved. The Church traces many of her practices to Ascension Thursday. We get our reckoning of the Proper of Time from Easter Sunday and count 40 days to Ascension Thursday. From Ascension Thursday, we trace our practice of the novena, nine days of Prayer, reminding ourselves that the Apostles spent these days in intense prayer with the Blessed Virgin Mary. On the fiftieth days of Easter, we mark the descent of the Holy Spirit. We get the name Pentecost (whose root comes from 50) because, 50 days after the celebration of the Passover, Ancient Israel celebrated the feast of Pentecost. That is why so many of Ancient Israel's children were in Jerusalem.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
For nearly 2,000 years, the Church kept this sacred time intact. However, something happened that has caused us to lose track of this very important and sacred time. Up until the year 2000, it did not seem to me that it was too much of a hardship or an imposition for people to go to one extra Mass during the week. If parents can make time to take their children to extracurricular activities such as karate, baseball practice, band practice, cheerleading events or other things, or if adults can make time to slavishly attend their gym regimen (zumba, spinning, weights, etc), why not invest the same time for God? Why not celebrate the fact that Christ raised the dignity of our humanity by taking His body back to heaven?</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Maybe the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (and, by extension, the bishops of Texas), thought that an additional day out of the week for Mass was too much of a burden so they came up with some sort of "pastoral" reason to move this important feast to Sunday. I would submit to them that this is a short-sighted practice because it actually reduces the significance of what that day means. When we break the connection that Ascension Thursday has with Holy Thursday and with the commemoration of the first Novena, then we lose sight of the beauty of the biblical and ecclesiastical significance that this solemnity has. Furthermore, if we are not impacted by the fact that Christ did not despise His humanity but took it with Him back to the Father, then, moving the Ascension to Sunday really does not do much.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
I do take comfort in the fact that Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI issued Summorum Pontificum, which liberalized the use of the Mass in the Extraordinary Form. At least in the 1962 Roman Missal, the integrity of Ascension Thursday is preserved. Lamentably, the closest celebration of the Mass in the Extraordinary Form is three hours away in the Rio Grande Valley. As much as I wanted to go to the Oratory in Pharr, I could not due to work. However, I do intend to take time off next year and go.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
I do pray that the bishops of Texas will come to the realization that restoring Ascension Thursday to its proper celebration takes us back to our scriptural and liturgical roots. The law of prayer is the law of belief; however, if we arbitrarily move feasts for the sake of convenience, then we have lost the connection to what is sacred and we risk having future generations that do not understand the significance of why the Church does what she does.</div>
benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-76002427531807171502014-05-25T22:23:00.000-07:002014-05-25T22:41:08.332-07:00Restoring what could be lost<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-6wYN96lfdaw-3iN3L2E3pcHdtxJrT0WycsuEFR2S3qoEWnR9ZfvzpZfxSEWZqn3C-gp1onEpVv1JEimU8_XhutgW1glGA9vygxH7wvWtv_ZAVzMcPr72IzaFAvkeMDKoEPlqlxZSxLA/s1600/MHC+Chapel.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-6wYN96lfdaw-3iN3L2E3pcHdtxJrT0WycsuEFR2S3qoEWnR9ZfvzpZfxSEWZqn3C-gp1onEpVv1JEimU8_XhutgW1glGA9vygxH7wvWtv_ZAVzMcPr72IzaFAvkeMDKoEPlqlxZSxLA/s1600/MHC+Chapel.JPG" height="320" width="240" /></a></div>
<br />
Yesterday, my Alma Mater celebrated its patronal feast day, the Memorial of Mary Help of Christians. A bad migraine kept me from visiting the school on its feast day; however, I was able to make the trek today.<br />
<br />
There is something to be said about having a whole campus to oneself. While the buildings had been renumbered and some new classrooms had been added here and there, the lay of the land remained the same. The chapel, shown above, has gone through very little changes; the stained glass windows were added after I graduated. <br />
<br />
I learned to love the liturgy in this very building. My father would drop me off at the ungodly hour of 6:30AM twice a week. I was bleary-eyed through most of the Mass and, in order to keep me awake, the nuns would invite me to help them in the sacristy. The nuns introduced me to the Lectionary and what was then known as the Sacramentary (now Roman Missal). I learned about the Proper of Time and the importance of liturgical colors. I even learned how to properly care for the sacred vessels. Those twice-a-week lessons instilled in me a love for the sacred liturgy and it deepened my Faith. My eighth grade teacher jokingly called me the class "theologian" because I really enjoyed the theological aspects of our daily religion classes.<br />
<br />
Now 32 years removed from my graduation, I returned to what once was. As I walked through the grounds of the open air campus, I could still see the eyeglass-wearing tall kid making her way to the library to check out some obscure book on the Mass or joining her classmates at what used to be the swimming pool.<br />
<br />
I also thought about how much school liturgies have regressed since my time as a student. I am not strictly speaking of my Alma Mater (although, in recent years, the new group has been slightly infected with LifeTeen and other weird things); I refer to what has happened elsewhere within the confines of my Local Church.<br />
<br />
At Mass this weekend, I noticed a small program that had been left behind in the sacristy. The parish school had celebrated its eighth grade graduation the night before and, as I read the program, I grew concerned. The school had drawn its music from the Protestant Praise and Worship genre (very similar to what LifeTeen has done) and had inserted some para-liturgical items into the sacred liturgy. One of the parents shared with me that she was concerned that the school had used recorded music and also engaged in some weird "teacher blessing" wherein the instructors were to impart a blessing on the graduates within the context of the Mass. <br />
<br />
Unfortunately, it seems to me that, at least at the Local Church, Catholic school staff tend to use the Mass as some sort of petri-dish for liturgical experimentation. The liturgy in question seemed to me to have heavy influences from both LifeTeen and the Leadership Council of Women Religious, (on the one hand, music from LifeTeen and on the other, the strange ritual that seems to have been drawn from the LCWR). One of the school's staff members actually comes from an order that is part of the LCWR. <br />
<br />
Based on the commentary of the concerned parent and what I have also personally experienced at these particular liturgies, it seems to me that both the <i>General Instruction of the Roman Missal</i> and <i>Redemptionis Sacramentum</i> are routinely ignored when it comes to school liturgies. The defense that organizers use is the <i>Directory for Masses with Children</i>; however, these are not kindergarten students who are being affected (although I am strongly against inflicting this kind of damage at an early age). These are eighth graders who are old enough to be exposed to proper liturgy.<br />
<br />
Having a song like "Alle, Alle, Alleluia" in place of the prescribed Gospel Acclamation is not allowed in the GIRM. Music like "Love One Another", "With Every Beat of My Heart" and "Shine, Jesus Shine" may work for youth gatherings, but, they are inconsistent with the Church's liturgical documents and sacred musical patrimony. <br />
<br />
It's as though the organizers either never read <i>Sacramentum Caritatis</i> and its back up documentation, or, they simply have chosen to go their own way, completely ignoring the rules. I know that I have posted both references, but they do merit repeating. In fact, while re-reading the <i>Instrumentum Laboris </i>for the 2005 Synod on the Eucharist, I found this major observations that the bishops made:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
(T)he songs and hymns presently in use need to be reconsidered.87 To enter into sacred or religious usage, instrumental or vocal music is to have a sense of prayer, dignity and beauty. This requires an integrity of form, expressing true artistry, corresponding to the various rites and capable of adaptation to the legitimate demands of inculturation. This is to be done without detracting from the idea of universality. Gregorian chant fulfills these needs and can therefore serve as a model, according to Pope John Paul II.88</blockquote>
Evidently, the bishops who took part in the <i>Instrumentum Laboris</i> believed (and still do) that music used in sacred worship needs to be re-examined. Nine years removed from the Synod, the problem persists. <br />
<br />
Now, here is the quote in question wherein the bishops specifically mention the problem with music used at Youth Masses:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
In other responses some lamented the poor quality of translations of liturgical texts and many musical texts in current languages, maintaining that they lacked beauty and were sometimes theologically unclear, thereby contributing to a weakening of Church teaching and to a misunderstanding of prayer. A few responses made particular mention of music and singing at Youth Masses. In this regard, it is important to avoid musical forms which, because of their profane use, are not conducive to prayer. Some responses note a certain eagerness in composing new songs, to the point of almost yielding to a consumer mentality, showing little concern for the quality of the music and text, and easily overlooking the artistic patrimony which has been theologically and musically effective in the Church’s liturgy.</blockquote>
If the Synod Fathers found this kind of music problematic, should this not raise concerns within the Local Church where such a genre is used for the youth Masses that take place within its jurisdiction? It certainly raised a concern for Pope Benedict XVI, prompting him to write this response in <i>Sacramentum Caritatis</i>:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Certainly as far as the liturgy is concerned, we cannot say that one song is as good as another. Generic improvisation or the introduction of musical genres which fail to respect the meaning of the liturgy should be avoided. As an element of the liturgy, song should be well integrated into the overall celebration (128). Consequently everything -- texts, music, execution -- ought to correspond to the meaning of the mystery being celebrated, the structure of the rite and the liturgical seasons (129). Finally, while respecting various styles and different and highly praiseworthy traditions, I desire, in accordance with the request advanced by the Synod Fathers, that Gregorian chant be suitably esteemed and employed (130) as the chant proper to the Roman liturgy (131). </blockquote>
If those who are planning retreats and other activities outside of the liturgy wish to use selections from Spirit and Song, then this could be suitable; however, when it comes to the Mass, they need to "respect the meaning of the liturgy", as Benedict noted in <i>Sacramentum Caritatis.</i> While it is certainly laudable that Catholic Schools are doing their best to help pass on the Faith to their charges, they also need to adhere by the guidelines set forth by the Church and not make things up as they go along.<br />
<br />
Along with music, another area of concern, insofar as these school Masses are concerned, is the mistaken idea that the <i>Directory for Masses with Children</i> permits everything and anything to occur. The idea of having teachers "bless" the graduating students within the context of the Mass is not allowed.<br />
<br />
Again, we turn towards the Holy See, specifically, the Congregation for Divine Worship, for direction on this matter:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Lay people, within the context of Holy Mass, are unable to confer blessings. These blessings, rather, are the competence of the priest (cf. Ecclesia de Mysterio, Notitiae 34 (15 Aug. 1997), art. 6, § 2; Canon 1169, § 2; and Roman Ritual De Benedictionibus (1985), n. 18). </blockquote>
Adding this "ritual" into the Mass is a serious abuse to the liturgy. It also confuses both the students and the parents because they have this mistaken notion that such an act is meaningful and special for the recipients, when it really has no bearing at all and seems to downplay the actual blessing that everyone will be receiving from the celebrant. Those planning such a thing, including religious staff (i.e. nuns, brothers) should know better, especially since <i>Sacrosanctum Concilium</i> expressly forbids this (<i>Redemptionis Sacramentum r</i>einforces this prohibition as well):<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Therefore no other person, even if he be a priest, may add, remove, or change anything in the Liturgy on his own authority. (<i>Sacrosanctum Concilium</i>) </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
[11.] The Mystery of the Eucharist "is too great for anyone to permit himself to treat it according to his own whim, so that its sacredness and its universal ordering would be obscured".27 On the contrary, anyone who acts thus by giving free rein to his own inclinations, even if he is a Priest, injures the substantial unity of the Roman Rite, which ought to be vigorously preserved,28 and becomes responsible for actions that are in no way consistent with the hunger and thirst for the living God that is experienced by the people today. Nor do such actions serve authentic pastoral care or proper liturgical renewal; instead, they deprive Christ's faithful of their patrimony and their heritage. For arbitrary actions are not conducive to true renewal,29 but are detrimental to the right of Christ's faithful to a liturgical celebration that is an expression of the Church's life in accordance with her tradition and discipline. In the end, they introduce elements of distortion and disharmony into the very celebration of the Eucharist, which is oriented in its own lofty way and by its very nature to signifying and wondrously bringing about the communion of divine life and the unity of the People of God.30 The result is uncertainty in matters of doctrine, perplexity and scandal on the part of the People of God, and, almost as a necessary consequence, vigorous opposition, all of which greatly confuse and sadden many of Christ's faithful in this age of ours when Christian life is often particularly difficult on account of the inroads of "secularization" as well.31 (<i>Redemptionis Sacramentum</i>)</blockquote>
Thus, the Church is very clear as to what can and cannot be done. Lamentably, it has been my experience that those who organize school liturgies tend to hold more value over "rituals" that they create themselves as opposed to that which the Church has established since her very foundation.<br />
<br />
The school liturgies that my Alma Mater held during my nine years there were not exactly the textbook model, at least insofar as music was concerned. The early 1970s were a turbulent time full of sad experimentation and equally bad music. We were subjected to the likes of the St. Louis Jesuits and other really bad things; however, to their credit, the nuns who handled our liturgies did not take it upon themselves to "create" something. That was not the way Don Bosco would have had it. <br />
<br />
However, these days, the creative spirit has reared its ugly head even there, though not as badly as in other places throughout the Local Church. <br />
<br />
The final stop on my solitary tour of my Alma Mater was also my first stop: the chapel. As I looked around the space, my mind went back to my younger years. I could still see myself flipping through the pages of the old Sacramentary, asking Sister Guadalupe why some of the wording was in red while a huge chunk was in black. She gave me the most basic explanation: the red is what the priest is supposed to do and the black is what he is supposed to say.<br />
<br />
It's really that simple. That is all that has to happen in the Mass. Unfortunately, when the red is not done and the black is not said, all of us lose out. The Church loses her liturgical integrity and the faithful, most especially the students, lose perspective. They lose out on the fact that the liturgy is not something that we can "cobble up", as Pope Benedict wrote on so many occasions; rather, the liturgy is a most precious gift from the Church so that we can render God proper worship. We need to restore that and, in the case of Catholic schools, such a restoration needs to be made, lest the children lose that connection between worshipping as we believe.<br />
<br />benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-92192812325345160042014-05-19T21:29:00.001-07:002014-05-22T15:23:29.688-07:00What St. Catherine could teach the LCRW<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://stmarystcatherine.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/St_Catherine._San_Domenico.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://stmarystcatherine.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/St_Catherine._San_Domenico.jpg" height="320" width="218"></a></div>
<br>
<div>
<br></div>
<div>
I was visiting the website of a Boston parish when I noted that the page had a link to a PDF of the homilies preached by the priests. The parish is staffed by a North American order of priests and I know the parochial vicar rather well, going back to his days as a young seminarian. </div>
<div>
<br></div>
<div>
While my friend is a good man and tries his best to be a good priest, he and I would regularly spar in matters of theology. Even after 20 years, the divide is still very wide.</div>
<div>
<br></div>
<div>
I do not know who preached this particular homily, delivered during the Fourth Sunday of Easter, 2012. That particular Good Shepherd Sunday fell on the Memorial of St. Catherine of Siena. Part of me suspects it was my friend who preached this. The style seems to fit.</div>
<div>
<br></div>
<div>
He preached about the life of St. Catherine of Siena, telling the faithful about how, after much prayer and discernment, she served as a Papal counselor who vehemently urged the Pope (at the time) to leave Avignon and return to Rome. Eventually, he heeded her counselor and returned to where he was supposed to be. So far, so good.</div>
<div>
<br></div>
<div>
The homilist then took a particularly bad turn when he brought up the issue of the fracas that is the Leadership Council of Women Religious.</div>
<div>
<br></div>
<div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
SHE WAS ABLE TO CHASTISE POPES, BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY BY KINGS, CALL FOR THE REFORM OF THE CLERGY NOT BECAUSE OF ANY OFFICE SHE HELD BUT BECAUSE OF DEVOTION AS A RELIGIOUS WOMAN AND THE WAY THAT DEVOTION WAS MANIFESTED IN HER ACTIONS. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
YOU MAY BE AWARE OF THE CURRENT SITUATION BETWEEN THE VATICAN OFFICE OF THE CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH AND THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE OF WOMAN RELIGIOUS. AFTER A LONG INQUIRY INTO THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ORGANIZATION THAT REPRESENTS 80% OF THE NUNS AND RELIGIOUS SISTERS IN THE U.S. THE VATICAN OFFICE THAT USED TO BE CALLED THE INQUISITION HAS DECIDED THAT THE ORGANIZATION IS NOT ORTHODOX ENOUGH IN HOW IT REPRESENTS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.<br>
WHAT WOULD CATHERINE DO?</blockquote>
</div>
<div>
Yes, my dear friend, what would St. Catherine do? He listed a litany of things that St. Catherine had said:</div>
<div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
She chastised and conjoled. She called the Pope Bobbo – Daddy. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
She called the Queen of Naples a sick woman guided by her passions. She wrote to a group of cardinals that they should be fragrant flowers but instead their stench filled the earth. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
She SPOKE TRUTH TO POWER WHICH I DON’T THINK WAS ABOUT PERSONAL COURAGE. I THINK IT CAME FROM HER PERSONAL HOLINESS.</blockquote>
</div>
<div>
<br></div>
<div>
Yes. She spoke the Truth because she prayed before she uttered or wrote one word. She spent time in front of the Blessed Sacrament seeking the Lord's counsel before she gave her own. St. Catherine wanted her words to be Christ's words.</div>
<div>
<br></div>
<div>
My dear friend meant to use St. Catherine as a means of chastising that "mean old Inquisition Office" for bringing the hammer down on the LCWR. Yet, his very words and observations defeat his own purpose.</div>
<div>
<br></div>
<div>
Given St. Catherine's deep love for Christ and His Church, I seriously doubt that she would have condoned the grievous actions and quasi-heretical theology that the LCWR has adopted in recent years. Rather than come to their defense against the likes of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI and Gerhard Cardinal Muller, St. Catherine would have chastised the LCWR for "moving past Jesus and the Church." She would have upbraided them for not holding fast to the Truth of the Faith and sinking into near gnosticism with their adoption of "conscious evolution", or whatever the new theological trend is these days.</div>
<div>
<br></div>
<div>
In Shakespeare's comedy, <i>The Taming of the Shrew, </i>Katherina refuses to yield to the authority of her husband, Petrucchio. Eventually, through a series of less than savory actions (some downright humiliating), he tames her into becoming an obedient bride. Finally, in a strange twist towards the end of the play, Katherina, literally manhandles (for lack of a better word), her very spoiled younger sister, Bianca, into submitting to her new husband.</div>
<div>
<br></div>
<div>
At some point, the LCWR needs "taming". They need to realize that they are heading in the wrong direction. Contrary to the homilist's observation, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is not trying to beat these nuns into submission. The homilist fails to realize that the very souls of these nuns are at stake. When a group of women religious decides that they are moving beyond Christ and beyond the Church, they are willfully choosing to cut themselves from the vine. The LCWR needs a "Katherina" to come in and have a frank discussion with them, maybe to the point of grabbing the group by the arm and showing them right path.</div>
<div>
<br></div>
<div>
So, I return to the the homilist's question: What would St. Catherine do?</div>
<div>
<br></div>
<div>
St. Catherine would pray and spend significant time with Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament. Sometimes we do our best thinking on our knees. It certainly worked for Pope St. John Paul II and Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI. </div>
<div>
<br></div>
<div>
After her time in prayer, St. Catherine would probably encourage the LCWR to do the same thing, maybe even asking them to join her before the Blessed Sacrament. She would then urge them to return to the roots of their calling, much as she urged Pope Gregory to man up and return to Rome, only she would have been more forceful with the nuns. Returning to Rome certainly takes on a deeper significance with the LCWR, because such a return is not about merely going back to a city as it is reconciling with Christ, with Peter and with the Church.</div>
<div>
<br></div>
<div>
That is the real lesson of St. Catherine of Siena. </div>
<div>
<br></div>
<div>
<br></div>
benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-9340348717815617312014-05-18T20:04:00.000-07:002014-05-18T20:04:06.255-07:00The Rock writes about The STONE<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://saltandlighttv.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/PeterKeys.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://saltandlighttv.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/PeterKeys.jpeg" height="292" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
While most could very well interpret today's readings to speak of Jesus' preparing a place for us, there appears to be a deeper meaning to what these scriptures say. In one form or another, today's readings reference the Temple.<br />
<br />
In his first letter, St. Peter tells the nascent Church that her members are "like living stones" that are being used to build up a spiritual house. I found it interesting that the man whom Jesus called "rock" and upon whom He would build his Church would write about Christ the "living stone," the "cornerstone, chosen and precious," although "rejected by the builders." <br />
<br />
For me, the above stained glass window captures the essence of what Jesus mandated when he established Peter's authority and of the Prince of the Apostle's first epistle. Even though Jesus knew that St. Peter would deny Him, Christ was also well aware of the former fisherman's deep love. That love was rock solid. It was that love that drove Peter to surreptitiously follow Jesus from Gethsemane to the High Priest's house; but, it was fear that led him to deny his Master. <br />
<br />
It is now that same love that compels and propels Peter to build up and encourage the young Church, fashioning these living stones into the new Temple. <br />
<br />
At the Last Supper discourse, Jesus references the Temple. Recall that in St. John's Gospel, as Jesus is clearing out the money changers who have profaned the Temple, He calls the sacred space His "Father's house." He uses that same phrase in today's Gospel reading, taken from St. John's account:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
2In my Father's house are many rooms; if it were not so, would I have told you that I go to prepare a place for you? 3 And when I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and will take you to myself, that where I am you may be also. </blockquote>
The Temple, God's dwelling on earth, was a huge complex with a plethora of rooms. It was the place where Ancient Israel, and, eventually, the whole of humanity, could have an encounter with the Lord. The Court of the Gentiles was the largest space because it was designed to allow non-Jews the opportunity to render God worship. The next smaller space was reserved for Ancient Israel and the final, most important space, was the Holy of Holies, reserved for the priest who offered sacrifices to God.<br />
<br />
St. John, in Revelation, returns to that images of the Temple and the heavenly Jerusalem, as he writes of seeing the new Jerusalem coming down from Heaven like a bride. When he describes the new Temple, John writes of the 12 foundations named after the 12 apostles. The whole Temple was encrusted in precious jewels, seemingly harkening what St. Peter referenced in his epistle when he referred to the living stones used to build up the spiritual house.<br />
<br />
In today's account from the Acts of the Apostles, we also see a veiled reference to the Temple. Towards the very end, St. Luke tells us that "a great many of the priests were obedient to the faith." These were the same priests who were offering the daily and weekly sacrifices in the Holy of Holies." Now, they would be partaking of the real sacrifice, the Eucharistic Sacrifice. They would be worshipping the Lord in "spirit and truth," just as Christ predicted to the Samaritan woman during their conversation at the well.<br />
<br />
All of this boils down to worship. The earthly liturgy gives us a foretaste of the heavenly reality that we will one day experience. At the Last Supper, Jesus laid down the framework as to how he would be worshipped. In today's Epistle, St. Peter, the Rock, reminds us that Christ is the cornerstone of the Church. He is also the Master Architect, building His Church on the rock that is St. Peter and we are a part of the myriad of living stones that make up this spiritual house, with the Holy Spirit serving as the mortar that holds us all together.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-23339636320138131012014-05-17T22:12:00.001-07:002014-05-18T14:11:50.356-07:00Tiring of the Bridegroom?<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhdp8lZu6O4w1SpYUenbQHTTOAAntg9wunNQE6G-FZzrzjHtnXgCm7z-BiIlwj7E6AbPtxCPA90zN9nbcCG8KmtAtD3nozzwGWB2dPqLMyN9x8x99ioFVXLrZqrl3Qe9fQIeZiqyuWhd80/s640/blogger-image--1326900507.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhdp8lZu6O4w1SpYUenbQHTTOAAntg9wunNQE6G-FZzrzjHtnXgCm7z-BiIlwj7E6AbPtxCPA90zN9nbcCG8KmtAtD3nozzwGWB2dPqLMyN9x8x99ioFVXLrZqrl3Qe9fQIeZiqyuWhd80/s400/blogger-image--1326900507.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Throughout the Old and New Testaments, the Lord used the imagery of the Bride and the Bridegroom to describe his relationship with humanity. In Hosea, the Lord reminds Israel of the infidelity she had shown ever since the time that that God had freed her from slavery in Egypt. She stayed from her Maker, engaging in worshipping false gods. In Ezekiel, the Lord continues to chastise Israel for her repeated indiscretions, likening her to an unfaithful wife.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
In St. John's Gospel, Jesus calls himself the Bridegroom. St. John the Baptist uses the same word to describe the Lord. Jesus uses this nuptial reference several times, most notably when he preaches the parable of the 10 wise virgins and the 10 foolish virgins who fall asleep waiting the arrival of the Bridegroom. The 10 wise ones plan ahead, saving their oil, while the 10 foolish ones waste it. When the Bridegroom finally comes, only the 10 wise ones are able to fully partake of the nuptial feast because they conserved what they had while the 10 foolish ones did not.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
St. Paul also uses this nuptial imagery. Christ is the Bridegroom and the Church, as St. Paul observed, is the Bride.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
In this day and age, we are presented with another nuptial imagery of Christ and the Bride; only in this case, the brides are the members of the Leadership Council of Women Religious, and the infractions, lamentably, are similar to those that Ancient Israel practiced in the times of Hosea and Ezekiel, and, to a huge extent, the actions of the 10 foolish virgins in Christ's parable. It is almost as though these brides of Christ, who have been united to the Lord for several decades, have drifted away from their Divine Spouse and have wasted away the oil of gladness that He had given them when they were consecrated to Him. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
The LCRW continues its sparring match with the Holy See concerning the Doctrinal Assessment conducted by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
His Eminence, Gerhard Cardinal Muller, Prefect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, delivered a powerful address to the LCWR, admonishing the organization for its selection of a dissident theologian whose book on the Holy Trinity was censured by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
It saddens me to learn that you have decided to give the Outstanding Leadership Award during this year’s Assembly to a theologian criticized by the Bishops of the United States because of the gravity of the doctrinal errors in that theologian’s writings. This is a decision that will be seen as a rather open provocation against the Holy See and the Doctrinal Assessment. Not only that, but it further alienates the LCWR from the Bishops as well. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I realize I am speaking rather bluntly about this, but I do so out of an awareness that there is no other interpretive lens, within and outside the Church, through which the decision to confer this honor will be viewed. It is my understanding that Archbishop Sartain was informed of the selection of the honoree only after the decision had been made. Had he been involved in the conversation as the Mandate envisions, I am confident that he would have added an important element to the discernment which then may have gone in a different direction. The decision taken by the LCWR during the ongoing implementation of the Doctrinal Assessment is indeed regrettable and demonstrates clearly the necessity of the Mandate’s provision that speakers and presenters at major programs will be subject to approval by the Delegate. I must therefore inform you that this provision is to be considered fully in force. I do understand that the selection of honorees results from a process, but this case suggests that the process is itself in need of reexamination. I also understand that plans for this year’s Assembly are already at a very advanced stage and I do not see the need to interrupt them. However, following the August Assembly, it will be the expectation of the Holy See that Archbishop Sartain have an active role in the discussion about invited speakers and honorees.</blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
This is not the first time that the LCRW has had questionable speakers at its conference. As Fr. John Zuhlsdorf noted in his blog, the organization invited a speaker who advocates "conscious evolution", something that is akin to the ancient heresy of gnosticism. In the same aforementioned address, Cardinal Muller remained direct in his comments:</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
For the last several years, the Congregation has been following with increasing concern a focalizing of attention within the LCWR around the concept of Conscious Evolution. Since Barbara Marx Hubbard addressed the Assembly on this topic two years ago, every issue of your newsletter has discussed Conscious Evolution in some way. Issues of Occasional Papers have been devoted to it. We have even seen some religious Institutes modify their directional statements to incorporate concepts and undeveloped terms from Conscious Evolution. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Again, I apologize if this seems blunt, but what I must say is too important to dress up in flowery language. The fundamental theses of Conscious Evolution are opposed to Christian Revelation and, when taken unreflectively, lead almost necessarily to fundamental errors regarding the omnipotence of God, the Incarnation of Christ, the reality of Original Sin, the necessity of salvation and the definitive nature of the salvific action of Christ in the Paschal Mystery. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
My concern is whether such an intense focus on new ideas such as Conscious Evolution has robbed religious of the ability truly to sentire cum Ecclesia. To phrase it as a question, do the many religious listening to addresses on this topic or reading expositions of it even hear the divergences from the Christian faith present? </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
This concern is even deeper than the Doctrinal Assessment’s criticism of the LCWR for not providing a counter-point during presentations and Assemblies when speakers diverge from Church teaching. The Assessment is concerned with positive errors of doctrine seen in the light of the LCWR’s responsibility to support a vision of religious life in harmony with that of the Church and to promote a solid doctrinal basis for religious life. I am worried that the uncritical acceptance of things such as Conscious Evolution seemingly without any awareness that it offers a vision of God, the cosmos, and the human person divergent from or opposed to Revelation evidences that a de facto movement beyond the Church and sound Christian faith has already occurred.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I do not think I overstate the point when I say that the futuristic ideas advanced by the proponents of Conscious Evolution are not actually new. The Gnostic tradition is filled with similar affirmations and we have seen again and again in the history of the Church the tragic results of partaking of this bitter fruit. Conscious Evolution does not offer anything which will nourish religious life as a privileged and prophetic witness rooted in Christ revealing divine love to a wounded world. It does not present the treasure beyond price for which new generations of young women will leave all to follow Christ. The Gospel does! Selfless service to the poor and marginalized in the name of Jesus Christ does! </blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
He also took them to task because of some comments that had been made about moving beyond Jesus and beyond the Church. I am no theologian by any means; however, I cannot wrap my head around a conscious statement that a professed religious, male or female, could make about going past Christ and His Church. This gives the Protestant notion of being "left behind" a whole new and weird meaning. Did these nuns not read Jesus' farewell discourage in St. John's Gospel account?</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in me, and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing. If a man does not abide in me, he is cast forth as a branch and withers; and the branches are gathered, thrown into the fire and burned.</blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Apart from Christ, we are nothing. We cannot do anything, as He told His disciples. When we were baptized, we were incorporated into the Church, the Body of Christ. Jesus founded the Church as the means for our salvation. He entrusted the Church to St. Peter and his successors, entrusting Himself in the Holy Eucharist. Moving beyond Christ and His Church is simply ludicrous. While Cardinal Muller rightly reminds the LCRW that they run the risk of falling into gnosticism, I would add that they also expose themselves to the guiles of the serpent who tempted Adam and Eve into the sin of pride. They seem to think that they know better than Christ and the Church. The sad reality is that they do not.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
The members of the LCRW seem to have taken the route that Ancient Israel took, drifting away from the Lord and seeking comfort in false theologies that are not only meaningless; they also place their souls in peril. It is as though the women have let the oil of gladness run dry and have found a cheap substitute.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
When a person or a group embarks on fuzzy theology, this leads into fuzzy liturgical practices. If a person or group believes that the Faith of the Church can be compromised, then disrespect for Her liturgical rites cannot be far behind. Even paraliturgical ceremonies can turn into a parody.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.tldm.org/News15/SisterMarleneWeisenbeck.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.tldm.org/News15/SisterMarleneWeisenbeck.jpg" height="195" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
It's almost as thought the LCRW has really lost it on so many levels. Some many want to be liberated of the "constraints" placed on them by the Church; however, that is not how true freedom works. True freedom, as Pope St. John Paul II reminds us, is not about doing as we wish, but, in doing as we ought. Cardinal Muller and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith are not trying to suppress these women; rather, they are reminding them of their true vocation. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Women religious, for the most part, consider themselves Brides of Christ and they rightly are. It seems to me that the LCWR has forgotten this. It is as though they have tired of their Bridegroom and want something more. Yet, when the Bridegroom is no less than Christ, Himself, who has given them everything, including His very self, what more could they want? </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
This is the question that the LCRW should, in all honesty, be asking themselves. </div>
benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-53083846225437704062014-05-17T21:06:00.002-07:002014-05-17T21:06:21.619-07:00Guarding Liturgical Integrity<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://luisapiccarreta.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Jesus-Priest-and-Victim.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://luisapiccarreta.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Jesus-Priest-and-Victim.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
We often forget that the priest stands in Persona Christi when he celebrates the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. He makes the words of Christ his own when prays the words of Consecration: "This is my Body; this is my Blood."</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
A local prelate recently gave a talk on the Priest as Victim, reminding his brethren in the priesthood of the importance of their vocation; but, he took this step further and offered them a catechesis on proper liturgy.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
In his address, he also reminded them of the importance of their role in the liturgy, telling them that they are servants of the Eucharist. Inasmuch as they stand in Persona Christi, they should maintain the integrity of the sacrifice that they are offering. This reminds me of an address that the former Archbishop Malcolm Ranjith gave back in 2008 at the Gateway Liturgical Conference in St. Louis, Missouri. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
(T)he correct approach to ars celebrandi of priests and even of the faithful would be to insure that they allow Christ to take over at the altar, becoming the voice, the hands and the being of Christ, or the alter Christus. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Sacramentum Caritatis affirms this very clearly when it states, “Priests should be conscious of the fact that in their ministry they must never put themselves or their personal opinions in the first place, but Jesus Christ. Any attempt to make themselves the center of the liturgical action contradicts their very identity as priests. The priest is above all a servant of others, and he must continuously work at being a sign pointing to Christ, a docile instrument in the Lord’s hands. This is seen particularly in his humility in leading the liturgical assembly, in obedience to the rite, uniting himself to it in mind and heart and avoiding anything that might give the impression of an inordinate emphasis on his own personality” (Sacr. Carit. 23). </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
In everything the priest does at the altar he should always let the Lord take control of his being. The words of John the Baptist are important in this matter: “He must increase and I must decrease” (Jn 3:30).</blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Lamentably, there are occasions when this does not occur. Last Saturday evening, I went to my maternal ancestral parish. The guest celebrant, who introduced himself as a professor of liturgy, took several liberties within the Mass that left me disconcerted. When he could not find the Collect in the Roman Missal, he proceeded to make up his own. He then added words here and there to the fixed texts of the Mass, something that is also forbidden in Sacrosanctum Concilium, the General Instruction of the Roman Missal and Redemptionis Sacramentum. He also asked the faithful to hold hands during the recitation of the Pater Noster.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
All of this made me wonder just what he is teaching the seminarians. After Mass, I tried to charitably bring the concerns up to him privately. He dismissed me right away and said that I should be reading the words of Christ. I told him that even Christ had high regard for the rubrics of Temple worship because these pointed directly to Him and were dictated by, no less than His own Father. I also asked him if he had read any of the documents. He rebuffed me and walked away.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Re-reading now-Cardinal Ranjinth's address in light of this episode and the address that the local prelate had given his brother priests made me think. Why is is that some in the clergy do not see liturgical integrity as a matter of grave importance. Again, let us turn to Cardinal Ranjith:</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>Obedience to Norms</b><br />As Pope John Paul II stated in Ecclesia de Eucharistia, “Liturgy is never anyone’s private property, be it of the celebrant or of the community in which the mysteries are celebrated”; and so “no one is permitted to undervalue the mystery entrusted to our hands; it is too great for anyone to feel free to treat it lightly and with disregard for its sacredness and its universality” (EE 52). </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Indeed, liturgy is a treasure given to the Church, which is to be jealously guarded. This is so also because it is the actio Christi realized in and through the Church, which is His own Body, in its three-fold extension — the Church Victorious, the Church Purifying and the Church Militant. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Thus every liturgical act has a meta-cosmic extension. Besides, it is in and with the Church that Christ realizes His priestly office, making the liturgy profoundly ecclesial, in the sense of the whole Church. It is the whole Church which celebrates liturgy each time a priest does so with his own local community. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>Liturgy Is “Given”</b><br />Liturgy thus should be considered a treasure “given” to the Church, not created by it. The fact of the steady growth of liturgical traditions along its bi-millennial history, and the surprisingly harmonious and natural way in which it has happened, is proof of the work of the Holy Spirit and the surpassing nobility of its contents. It is like a tree, which continues to grow, at times shedding its leaves, at other times being pruned to become stronger and straighter, but always remaining the same tree. Sacred Liturgy has undergone a similar process of growth but never a new beginning, right from the earliest times even until now — and so it will be even in the future because it is Christ Himself who through His Mystical Body, the Church, has continued to exercise His priestly office. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>Christ, the Main Celebrant at the Altar</b><br />And so, the correct approach to ars celebrandi of priests and even of the faithful would be to insure that they allow Christ to take over at the altar, becoming the voice, the hands and the being of Christ, or the alter Christus.</blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
These are the same points that the local prelate made. The sad thing is that when the faithful begin to press their clergy to celebrate the Mass according to the norms, they get labeled as "liturgical police" or "Pharisees" when that is not the case at all. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
There was a reason why Pope St. John Paul II ordered the promulgation of Redemptionis Sacramentum, assigning both the former Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger and Francis Cardinal Arinze with the task of writing this important document. The recently canonized John Paul lamented over the fact that shadows exist and continue to persist in the manner in which the Mass is celebrated.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
As Redemeptionis Sacramentum notes:</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
[11.] The Mystery of the Eucharist "is too great for anyone to permit himself to treat it according to his own whim, so that its sacredness and its universal ordering would be obscured".27 On the contrary, anyone who acts thus by giving free rein to his own inclinations, even if he is a Priest, injures the substantial unity of the Roman Rite, which ought to be vigorously preserved,28 and becomes responsible for actions that are in no way consistent with the hunger and thirst for the living God that is experienced by the people today. Nor do such actions serve authentic pastoral care or proper liturgical renewal; instead, they deprive Christ's faithful of their patrimony and their heritage. For arbitrary actions are not conducive to true renewal,29 but are detrimental to the right of Christ's faithful to a liturgical celebration that is an expression of the Church's life in accordance with her tradition and discipline. In the end, they introduce elements of distortion and disharmony into the very celebration of the Eucharist, which is oriented in its own lofty way and by its very nature to signifying and wondrously bringing about the communion of divine life and the unity of the People of God.30 The result is uncertainty in matters of doctrine, perplexity and scandal on the part of the People of God, and, almost as a necessary consequence, vigorous opposition, all of which greatly confuse and sadden many of Christ's faithful in this age of ours when Christian life is often particularly difficult on account of the inroads of "secularization" as well.31 </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
[12.] On the contrary, it is the right of all of Christ's faithful that the Liturgy, and in particular the celebration of Holy Mass, should truly be as the Church wishes, according to her stipulations as prescribed in the liturgical books and in the other laws and norms. Likewise, the Catholic people have the right that the Sacrifice of the Holy Mass should be celebrated for them in an integral manner, according to the entire doctrine of the Church's Magisterium. Finally, it is the Catholic community's right that the celebration of the Most Holy Eucharist should be carried out for it in such a manner that it truly stands out as a sacrament of unity, to the exclusion of all blemishes and actions that might engender divisions and factions in the Church.32</blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
What part of this teaching is lost on the visiting priest I encountered last weekend? What part of this message is lost on clergy and laity alike who continue to treat the Sacred Liturgy as their own personal property?</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
While the obvious answer is that we need to pray for our priests, we also need to stand up for liturgical integrity and read the documents for ourselves. Even Redemptionis Sacramentum encourages the faithful to charitably defend the liturgy. Celebrants, whether they be priests or bishops, also need to read the documents. It is only by working to ether that we can all ensure that the integrity of the Church's most sacred and most important treasure is guarded and maintained.</div>
benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-16705906221799052292014-05-04T18:58:00.000-07:002014-05-04T18:58:14.043-07:00Finding the Real Presence of Christ<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://roadsfromemmaus.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/emmaus-road-mosaic.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://roadsfromemmaus.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/emmaus-road-mosaic.jpg" height="219" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
Today, the Church presents us with the account of Jesus' encounter with two of his disciples as they were leaving Jerusalem, heading towards Emmaus.<br />
<br />
Cleopas, who, according to ancient Tradition, was the brother of St. Joseph and thus, Jesus' uncle, and his fellow disciple, were, for all intents and purposes, leaving the Cross and everything associated with it. They were heading in the wrong direction, both literally and figuratively. <br />
<br />
Suddenly, Jesus pops up out of nowhere and listens in on their conversation as the two disciples are recapping the weekend's events. Oddly enough, they do not recognize him. Not even His own uncle, Cleopas, recognizes Jesus. Jesus asks them what they are discussing and Cleopas seems shocked that his fellow traveler seems to not know what all happened. Jesus certainly knew it because he went through it. Cleopas explains to his new companion just what had occurred. He even goes on to say that some of the disciples, including the women, had gone to the tomb, but did not see Jesus. Evidently, neither can Cleopas as Jesus is walking along right with him.<br />
<br />
Jesus chastises them for their inability to understand the Scriptures. He then proceeds to give them the best biblical exegesis of all time. This experience leads Cleopas and his companion to beg their fellow sojourner to abide with them for the night, as it was getting late. Jesus obliges and then, something remarkable happens. He takes the bread, blesses it, breaks it and distributes it to them. Then, he vanished. It was at that point, that Cleopas realizes that he had just spent major time with his now resurrected Nephew. His other companion is also ecstatic. Then, both of them make a hasty return to Jerusalem, going back to the Cross.<br />
<br />
The story of Cleopas and his companion and their encounter with Jesus should resonate with us. What they experienced was, in essence, what we, as Catholics, experience every Sunday, every day: an encounter with the resurrected Christ within the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. At every Mass, we read from Sacred Scripture, the celebrant explains the readings in his homily and then, we go on to the Eucharistic Sacrifice, where Jesus ones again becomes fully present in the altar. We return back to the moment of the Paschal Triduum, for his Passion, Death and Resurrection. Then, after the Fraction Rite, we receive Christ's Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity in Holy Communion. We encounter Christ just as Cleopas and the other disciple. In fact, from Holy Thursday on, Jesus left us the means by which we were to encounter Him. He told St. Mary Magdelene not to hold on to him anymore, as now, He would be fully present in the Eucharist.<br />
<br />
The first mistake that Cleopas and his companion made was in fleeing Jerusalem and going to a place where they thought they would be safe, namely, a Roman garrison named Emmaus. When we flee the Cross and everything that comes with us, when we flee suffering and choose not to hold on to Christ, we become, as Pope Benedict XVI rightly predicted, caught up in so many "winds of doctrine that the little boat of our faith begins to be tossed to and fro" in some sort of "dictatorship of relativism." When we are not moored to the Rock of St. Peter and follow another course, we lose our way. Cleopas and the other disciple were losing the way. In Cleopas' case, this was rather remarkable, considering the fact that his Nephew was Christ. He did not recognize just Who he was leaving and, subsequently, Who was coming after him.<br />
<br />
On Twitter, Dr. Taylor Marshall wrote that he met up with two former Catholics who had left the Church and gone on to Joel Osteen's ecclesisal community. He asked them why they left and they told him that the music and preaching were more attractive. Marshall then asked them about the Eucharist, the Real Presence. They told him that they had "communion service" with crackers and individual cups. They said that they felt that they would be ingesting germs by receiving from the chalice. Here, Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI explains why the Eucharist is so important. In Sacramentum Caritatis, he writes that:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"In the Sacrament of the Altar, the Lord meets us, men and women created in God's image and likeness (cf. Gen 1:27) and becomes our companion along the way. In this Sacrament, the Lord truly becomes food for us, to satisfy our hunger for truth and freedom. Since only the truth can make us free (cf. Jn 8:32), Christ becomes for us the food of truth."</blockquote>
<br />
Their responses saddened me. While Osteen seems to have a positive message, his only focus is on the false Gospel of Prosperity. My fellow Catholics repost his messages on Facebook and he rarely proclaims Christ Crucified nor does he speak of heavenly realities. His only concerns seems to be the here and now. Insofar as music is concerned, what is offered at Lakeway is more along the lines of a sacro-pop concert with very little substance. The two women in question have left behind the "food of truth" for something that, in the long run, is far from satisfying and offers no real nourishment.<br />
<br />
Sadly, I have experienced this even within my own family. I found out on Facebook that a couple of them left the Church and had their children (baptized Catholic) confirmed as Methodists. This was very painful. I still love my relatives, but, it saddens me that they would choose to leave the Church that Christ founded. Two others have done the same thing. <br />
<br />
It seems to me that for them, and for the two women that Marshall encountered, they want to flee the Cross. Their idea pretty much matches what Osteen preaches: no suffering and much prosperity. But, this is not the message of the Gospel. As Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI notes:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"Christ did not promise an easy life. Those who desire comforts have dialed the wrong number. Rather, He shows us the way to great things, the good, towards an authentic human life. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
When He speaks of the cross that we ourselves have to carry, it has nothing to do with a taste of torture or of pedantic moralism. It is the impulse of love, which has its own momentum and does not seek itself but opens the person to the service of truth, justice and the good. Christ shows God to us, and thus the true greatness of man." </blockquote>
<br />
Christ came to open up the way of salvation for us. He came so that we could have eternal life. He gives us His very Self as food for the journey. How anyone could walk away from that is beyond me. Cleopas and his companion did; but, Jesus, Good Shepherd that He is, goes after them and re-orients them to Jerusalem, to the Cross. <br />
<br />
I can only pray that the Good Shepherd will seek out those two women and my relatives and bring them back to the true Faith, back to the Cross. May they find comfort from the example of Cleopas and return from Emmaus.<br />
<br />
<br />benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-36931618926230436462014-04-13T18:12:00.000-07:002014-04-13T18:12:13.368-07:00And so it begins...<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="270" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/keMmxqTk1qw" width="480"></iframe><br />
<br />
Today, with the celebration of Palm Sunday of the Lord's Passion, the Church enters into her most sacred time of the year, Holy Week.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-0B_nciJ0Yv3Sz7WES7GJWKH3X3WYIo4CjeNHBE6HKnvwVAZFwnwlh2dguSSXke32azfHSCIA652FIwJqRIHOwW1RDv0XrQTPftRJ362mNyQAHkyqJ2VsAisN9Mc8uZU1Ar1g23l6yV8/s1600/Palm+Sunday.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-0B_nciJ0Yv3Sz7WES7GJWKH3X3WYIo4CjeNHBE6HKnvwVAZFwnwlh2dguSSXke32azfHSCIA652FIwJqRIHOwW1RDv0XrQTPftRJ362mNyQAHkyqJ2VsAisN9Mc8uZU1Ar1g23l6yV8/s1600/Palm+Sunday.jpg" height="291" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
The Palm Sunday liturgy begins with the joyful, triumphant praises of <i>Hosanna to the Son of David</i>, the opening antiphon and progresses to the epitome of entrance processionals, <i>All Glory, Laud and Honor</i>. We recall Jesus' triumphal entry into His own city, Jerusalem, and how the crowds chanted praises while waving palm and olive branches.<br />
<br />
But, as the liturgy continues, we experience a shift from the joyful to the sorrowful. We listen to a section of Isaiah's prophecy of the Suffering Servant (which we will hear throughout the week). Then, we chant Psalm 22, <i>My God, My God, why have you abandoned me</i>, the psalm that Jesus quotes as he is hanging on the cross. The psalm predicts what Jesus will undergo, the piercing of his hands and his feet and the casting of lots for his vesture. Then, we listen to St. Paul's Canticle, taking from his epistle to the Philippians, exhorting us to bend the knee at the name of Jesus and reminding us of Christ's obedience even to the point of suffering through death on a cross.<br />
<br />
In the Gospel account, we live through the sacred moments of Jesus' Passion and Death. Twice a year, the Gospel proclamation is shared between the priest, the deacon and the people (with the priest taking on the part of Christ). In Rome, it is traditionally chanted by three deacons, with the choir taken on the part of the crowd. <br />
<br />
A dear priest friend of mine told me that he prefers to divide the Passion into parts (as listed in the above paragraph), where he reads the part of Christ and the faithful take on the role of the crowd. He explained that, ultimately, we are that crowd. That crowd speaks for us. We need to remind ourselves that it was, as Isaiah proclaims in the first reading used on Good Friday, "He was pierced for our offenses, crushed for our sins; upon him was the chastisement that makes us whole." It is important that this reality confront us, head-on and impact us. A lot of the time, we tend to water down our faith and not really focus on our need for conversion. Sin is a powerful reality. It is also deadly, more deadly than AIDS or any form of cancer. Cancer and AIDS destroy the body; sin destroys the soul. Jesus said, "Beware of the one who can destroy the soul."<br />
<br />
In his homily, my priest friend said that all of us have a role in the Passion. In fact, nearly every serious sin is found there: sloth, envy, hatred, violence and greed. The most serious of these is despair, the despair that Judas languished in because he believed that he was beyond salvation. This is the worst sin against God because despair means that we do not believe that He can save us. That is the ultimate death of the soul.<br />
<br />
Moments after the account of the Passion, we relive the sacred mysteries of our salvation when we enter into the Liturgy of the Eucharist. Jesus becomes just as present to us as He was to the Apostles who betrayed, denied and abandoned him, to the crowds who cheered for him in the beginning and then jeered at him towards the end and to Pilate, Caiaphas and the Romans who played a huge role in His Crucifixion.<br />
<br />
Yet, as deeply profound as these mysteries are, many parishes sadly miss the boat in making the connection between the liturgy and the music for today's Mass. They do not realize that with today's liturgy, we enter the high point, the summit of the Church's liturgical year. So, what do these well-meaning parish music directors pick? Very rarely will we pray the Introit and the Communion Antiphons (the Church's official music for the sacred liturgy). Instead, choir directors select songs that really do not convey the sacred mysteries that unfold before us. <i>The King of Glory</i>, <i>One Bread-One</i> <i>Body</i>, <i>Our God Reign</i>s, and other pieces lack the sober nature called for during this time of year.<br />
<br />
I know I keep writing a lot about this issue, but there is cause for concern. Fr. John Zuhlsdorf, in his excellent blog, WDTPRS, lamented about the emerging Magisterium of Sophomores, wherein students at a Catholic High School were protesting an address given by an orthodox priest which touched on some hard-truth issues. I do not know if these students have been exposed to any liturgy (LifeTeen or otherwise); however, when the liturgy is watered down, that leads to a weakening in the Faith. When the sacred mysteries no longer impact us and we replace the beauty and solemnity of the Mass with soft Christian pop music, we have contributed to the decline in our Faith. Such a decline will eventually render us just as apathetic and slothful as the crowds on that first Good Friday.<br />
<br />
As we go deeper into the mystery of Holy Week, let us pray that we will allow these sacred realities to permeate into our hearts and souls. benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3959521002954863236.post-80101951102294028692014-04-07T21:19:00.000-07:002014-04-07T21:19:11.612-07:00Imploring God's Mercy<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="344" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/bz1kinHarMQ" width="459"></iframe><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
If we read Monday's Gospel account of Jesus saving the life of the woman whom the Pharisees caught in adultery on the surface, focusing only on the Lord's rebuke of the men who wanted to stone the accused to death, we might miss out on the deeper message.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiIaMHj28XzPXFS5rsaRkIDM4RYcOOq_18sUxZXRtBx1rtO9K4qBT0TA2VZbKm4M6nDc58-TQ3PehsVIpsS3uZPUGgbqiPLFO6d8mpJFAPyIKH0jULpMqyQDDAXz0wD3OwHYEExU-42GVQ/s1600/Jesus+and+the+Adulterous.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiIaMHj28XzPXFS5rsaRkIDM4RYcOOq_18sUxZXRtBx1rtO9K4qBT0TA2VZbKm4M6nDc58-TQ3PehsVIpsS3uZPUGgbqiPLFO6d8mpJFAPyIKH0jULpMqyQDDAXz0wD3OwHYEExU-42GVQ/s1600/Jesus+and+the+Adulterous.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
The elders had found the woman in the midst of the grievous sin of adultery, and, seized by bloodlust, they wanted her executed. The scene is somewhat similar to the reading from the Book of Daniel, where the innocent Susanna was threatened with execution on a bogus charge of adultery, only, in Susanna's case, the two elders were guilty.<br />
<br />
In the first reading, young Daniel condemns the lecherous judges to a violent death for falsely accusing Susanna. On the other hand, in the Gospel reading, Jesus challenges the men wanting to kill the adulteress to look into their own lives and see the seriousness of the sins that they, themselves have committed. One by one, beginning with the elders, the lynch mob disperses.<br />
<br />
After Jesus is left alone with the adulterous, he does something remarkable. He does not condemn her; however, he warns her about sin. For Jesus, the life of her soul is just as important as the life of her body. He had literally saved her from physical death; his main concern now is to save her from the eternal death that comes from sin.<br />
<br />
Sin is a very painful reality. Unfortunately, the modern age tends to sugar coat the real danger that sin poses to us. Even the music that has crept into the Church over the course of 40 years downplays the need for repentance and ignores the fact that we stand in need of God's mercy. Songs like "Beyond the Days" and "Ashes" tend to make the Lenten season somewhat syrupy, focusing on either social justice or some other sappy theme. <br />
<br />
The chant par excellence for the Lenten season, the "Attende Domine", brings home the point that we are sinners. We stand in stark need of God's mercy. Like the woman caught in adultery, we stand bare before God in sorrow. Although the above video, taken from the 2010 Papal Ash Wednesday Mass, features the chant in its original Latin, below, is a translation of the 10th century prayer. <br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;">Hear us, O Lord, and have mercy,<br />Because we have sinned against Thee.<br /><br /><b>Refrain:</b><br />Hear us, O Lord, and have mercy,<br />Because we have sinned against Thee.<br /><br />1. To Thee, highest King,<br />Redeemer of all,<br />We lift up our eyes<br />In weeping:<br />Hear, O Christ, the prayers<br />of your servants.<br /><b>Refrain</b><br /><br />2. Right hand of the Father,<br />Cornerstone,<br />Way of salvation,<br />Gate of heaven,<br />Wash away our<br />Stains of sin.<br /><b>Refrain</b><br /><br />3. We beseech Thee, God,<br />In Thy great majesty:<br />Hear our groans<br />With Thy holy ears:<br />Calmly forgive<br />Our crimes.<br /><b>Refrain</b><br /><br />4. To Thee we confess<br />Our sins admitted<br />With a contrite heart<br />We reveal the things hidden:<br />By Thy kindness, O Redeemer,<br />Overlook them.<br /><b>Refrain</b><br /><br />5. The Innocent, seized,<br />Not refusing to be led;<br />Condemned by false witnesses<br />On account of impious men<br />Those whom Thou hast redeemed,<br />Keep safe, O Christ.<br /><b>Refrain</b></span></i></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b><br /></b></span></i></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">The last verse contrasts sharply with the episode of the woman caught in adultery. The angry mob seized the woman and condemned her to a shameful death. While they quoted the Law of Moses against the impious woman, there was no mercy in their hearts, only a sick thirst for blood. Just as the woman was thrust before Jesus, the Lord, Himself, would soon be bound and accused by false witnessed, condemned to a painful death. He, himself, would take the place of the adulterous woman, offering Himself as a Victim for her sins, for the sins of the lynch mob and for the sins of everyone who has cried throughout the ages, "Crucify Him." </span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><br /></span></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">Yes, there is a wideness in God's mercy; however, if we do not realize that we stand in stark need of it, then we become like that lynch mob and like the two elders who falsely accused Susanna. The Attende Domine helps us to remember that we are sinners who must humbly implore the mercy of so loving a God. Only when we begin to realize this, and engage in a Lenten regimen that takes the focus off of ourselves and re-orients us to God and our neighbor, can we begin our conversion.</span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><br /></span></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><br /></span></span>benedictgalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04918740294439486623noreply@blogger.com0